JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for XRD Archives


XRD Archives

XRD Archives


XRD@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

XRD Home

XRD Home

XRD  2000

XRD 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

From:

Rajdip Bandyopadhyaya <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:01:59 +0200

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (59 lines)

Hello everyone,

I am performing SAXS (small-angle X-ray scattering) of mesoporous
materials, like MCM-41.

I have two queries.

1. Which is the correct/better way of quantifying percentage of
crystallinity of mesoporous powders like MCM-41, from their small angle
X-ray diffraction peaks - by the peak height, width or area? I mean a more
intense (higher peak) or a sharper (less width) peak both mean better
crystallinity/order of pores in the mesoporous sample. To compare a set of
samples, which is the better way to quantitatively compare their
crytallinity?

2. We use a line source of X-ray, which therefore requires desmearing of
the resulting diffraction profile, to get the ideal profile corresponding
to a point source of X-ray. Now in comparing the intensity of the spectra
of several samples, one needs to first normalize all the profiles with
respect to the primary (undeviated) X-ray beam energy, because it can vary
during the run, from sample to sample.

We use the 3-D view software (provided by MBraun-Graz) to do normalizing
and de-smearing. Now, which is a better way of processing the raw
scattering data of intensity versus diffraction angle.

i) First normalize all the samples together (with respect to the
primary beam energy of one of the samples) and then de-smear?

or, ii) First de-smear each sample and then do the normalization of all
the de-smeared samples together.

For a set of samples, the two procedures gave qualitatively broadly
similar but quantitatively quite different peak height and width.

Thanks for reading. Any suggestion is welcome.
Regards,
Rajdip

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajdip Bandyopadhyaya     *BREATHE ON THE RUN, 'coz TIME is SHORT and SWEET*

Dept. of Chemical Engg.       | E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev |         [log in to unmask]
PO Box 653                    | Web:    http://144.16.75.130/rajdip
Beer Sheva 84105              | Ph:     (Off: Room 330) +972 (8) 647 2146
Israel                        |         (Lab: Room 335) +972 (8) 646 1492
                              |         (Lab: Room 218) +972 (8) 647 2142
Fax: +972 (8) 647 2916        |            (Residence:) +972 (8) 649 6522

______________________________________________
XRD mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/xrd.html

To leave the list use the webpage or send an email to:
[log in to unmask] with the text
leave xrd

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2023
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2017
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
August 2014
April 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
September 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
September 2009
August 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager