Hello all!
I have begun to learn spm ,planning to use it for a subject by
subject analysis, and have been facing a problem concerning
orientation (I know that the topic has been covered extensively in
the mailing list but I have not been able to find a specific answer to
my questions).
My anatomic and functional images are initially in the following
orientation (with origin at the center of the volume):
z:negative on top slice and positive on bottom slice(cerebellum).
x:negative on the left of the slice and positive on the right of the
slice.
y:the back of the brain has positive co-ordinates and the front
has negative ones.
ie:the slices are (sort of) in radiologic orientation but with the
back being were the front should be and if one looks at the sagittal
view,the brain is 'upside-down'.
Given the fact I do not want to normalise (at least for now),I
perform the following reorientation in SPM:<resize x,y,z:-1 and
crosshair at the AC>:So I am bringing everything (I think),to the
Talairach orientation.I apply that to the anatomy as well as all the
functional volumes.
I then :Motion correct and reslice the functional volumes,coregister
the anatomy to the mean functional image (without reslicing-
target=meanimage,object=t1mri) , segment the anatomy using the
results to extract a 3D brain rendering of the subject and smooth
the functional motion-corrected dataset.(I do not perform slice
timing correction for now).
The 3D rendered brain is displayed up-side down (it is difficult
to say anything about the L-R symmetry),as if no information from
the *.mat files has been used.The problem persists when I render
my results on it,though the 'blobs' seem to be in the correct
location on the rendered brain structures (given the nature of the
task performed by the subject).When I display the results on the
axial slices,the situation persists (the blobs are correctly
placed,but the anatomy is in the original 'pseudo-radiologic'
orientation).
My questions are the following:
a:Am I correct in putting everything into Talairach orientation in the
begginning, since I do not normalise? How does that affect
segmentation and coregistration? (what do these routines 'assume'
concerning orientation?,what do I answer to the 'are these MRIs
spatially normalised?' prompt in 'spm_segment'- I have always
answered 'no' until now . )
b:Where do my rendering/display problems stem from?Are there
other routines/functions in spm that are affected?What would be a
good remedy?
Thanks!
Charis.
Charidimos Tzagarakis MD
Brain Sciences Center and University of Minnesota.
Address:
Brain Sciences Center (11B)
Minneapolis VA Medical Center
One Veterans Drive
55417 Minneapolis MN
USA
Tel:612-725-2000 ext 1756
email: [log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|