On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Geraint wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> > I did not know that regions that were "explicitly masked" were still
> > formally considered in the search volume.
>
> I think there may be a terminological confusion here (on my part); Matthew
> kindly pointed out to me:
>
> > I think there might be some confusion of terms here, as I think exlicit
> > masking for Esa meant using a masking image to restrict the volume analyzed in
> > the statistics setup stage, and I think you mean (by explicit masking) using a
> > contrast to mask another contrast.
>
> That's certainly the way I meant explicit masking, so I may have mistaken
> Esa's usage of the term (Esa: can you clarify?). Apologies to the list for
> any confusion.
>
> best,
>
> Geraint
>
Maybe I didn't make my clarification clear enough.
I used explicit masking in statistics setup stage.
Then we come back to the original question:
Can explicit masking be used to visualize on the MIP supratreshold
voxels belonging to the VOI?
Best regards,
Esa
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|