Hi Erik,
> I did not know that regions that were "explicitly masked" were still
> formally considered in the search volume.
I think there may be a terminological confusion here (on my part); Matthew
kindly pointed out to me:
> I think there might be some confusion of terms here, as I think exlicit
> masking for Esa meant using a masking image to restrict the volume analyzed in
> the statistics setup stage, and I think you mean (by explicit masking) using a
> contrast to mask another contrast.
That's certainly the way I meant explicit masking, so I may have mistaken
Esa's usage of the term (Esa: can you clarify?). Apologies to the list for
any confusion.
best,
Geraint
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|