Why not start your own list based on these principles?
At 12:21 PM 8/2/2010 +0100, you wrote:
>Dear Sean - Not a commitee, but 4 or 5 people who have been around the list
>for a while, who are cool and independent and who can spread the
>responsibility load. It seems to me that the singular manner of solving
>disputes is getting reflected back in 1 on1 (or 10 on 1) type engagements
>with the list. I think the list should formally reflect the plurality it
>wishes to promote.
>
>best
>Paul (not egg)
>
>
>
>Egg takes John Kinsella to task for what he calls 'the cult of you' and
>proposes that there should be more than one listowner...What do you have in
>mind, Egg? A committee? A committee composed of participants in the list? If
>so, given the way the list has been carrying on lately, God help us.
>All the best
>Sean O'Brien
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|