In a message dated 07/12/2000 5:40:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<< pseudo-scientists like
Kristeva and Lacan, >>
Lacan is pseudo-scientist? what authority do you claim to be able to make
such a statement? are you a non-pseudo-scientist? what is a
non-pseudo-scientist -- someone who isn't a mathematician or a chemist? or
is your claim that any medical treatment that doesn't rely on pharmaceuticals
is a pseudo-science? as a matter of courtesy, why don't you criticize the
specifics of Kristeva's remarks, rather then just rain on cassie's parade
with your opinion -- is it because you can't, because you don't know enough
about this pseduo-science of psychoanalysis to talk about it?
jb..
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|