Yes, yes, I know.
Sorry, Susanne and I share a room at College.
While I am writing she is sitting by me.
Today the sky is so gray. No fun to come.
I wish to apologise to all and thank Hugh for his kind support.
I was in good faith and indeed I was merely reporting an event from
childhood.
("Susanne, pleasee, stop being silly! I am writing back to the list!")
She (Susanne) is urging me to react with some degree of verbal vehemence.
But I will not. And I do apologise if I offended Jona nd Joane's
sensibility.
Sonia Lipenolch
----- Original Message -----
From: Sonia Lipenolch <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 1999 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: Sickening? Oh, Joana and Jon!
> Apologies for the unbelievable amount of mispelled words contained in my
> reecnt post.
> The probelm is that when words sound more or less the same,
> I always go for the wrong one. It meant "weak stomach", not "week".
> I sould learn how to write properly, though.
> Must be very annoying for you. It is surely so for my tutors.
> During the holidays I will revise my grammar and sto being such an ass.
>
> Susanne
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: susanne <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 1999 4:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Sickening? Oh, Joana and Jon!
>
>
> > Someone attached Sonia Lipenolch for having sent a
> > certain message which was rightly interpreted by Joseph and incorrectly
by
> > Jon and Joana.
> >
> > At first sight, I thought the vehement protest had been sent by a member
> of
> > the Salvation Army.
> > Jon and Joana, do you practice the Office of Humor? Do you ever visit
it?
> > If yes, than yours is a strange reaction.
> > If not, keep sending your charming posts.
> >
> > I could be equally sickened by your attempt to rise
> > a squad against a flying feather.
> >
> > Keep an eye on your stomach, though.
> > It seems to be too week for this world. Oh, the amount of sickening
things
> > one sees,
> > in life....
> > As for Sonia's initial post, .....for God Sake!.
> > None would really it seriously. Not every message must be read in a
> literal
> > way.
> > There have been moralist who employed what you might consider
> > sickening contents to make their point. (De Sade?)
> > How about publishing a text on
> > "The necessity of eating children to resolve the economical problems of
> > Ireland?" Have you come across to these kind of fierce polemists?
> >
> > Susanne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ioana Petrescu <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2000 5:48 AM
> > Subject: Re: Sickening
> >
> >
> > > At 08:43 PM 8/07/00 -0700, you wrote:
> > > > > From: Sonia Lipenolch ([log in to unmask])
> > > > >
> > > > > Men who had sisters belong sometimes all together to a different
> > > > > category of those who never had any contact during their childhood
> > > > > and adolescence with the female of the species. They tend to
> > > > > analyze female behavior as hysterical. Only men who had sisters
> > > > > have learned how easily a sister can break a wooden chair on her
> > > > > brothers' head and send him to hospital.
> > > > >
> > > > > The poetry of it!
> > > >
> > > > I find the above repulsive. I didn't sign on to this list
expecting
> > > >that it would deliver to me snickering justifications of violence.
> > >
> >________________________________________________________________________
> > > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com
> > >
> > > I agree, and if you keep reading the posts you'll see it didn't stop
> here.
> > > I was wondering whether we could discuss on the list poetry as sanity
> and
> > > writers who supported each other. I know that even Goethe was
> occasionally
> > > nasty to Schiller but...
> > > Ioana
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|