>
> Re Id's - I'm looking forward to the day when we can all talk in here and
> therefore establish one identity. We all recognize EP as her
Italian/English
> gives her away. What she doesn't know is that she lacks credibility no
> matter how hard she tries. Shame too, that a woman has to resort to such
> nonsense.
> HH
> http://www.geocities.com/helen_hagemann
Good Lord! This is enviousness!
Helen, what guarantee do you have that EP is Italian and what prove do you
have that she is a woman!
Think more carefully, ponder your words, before you speak!
And IF she is a woman: Are you not ashamed, Helen, to rise such issues
against another woman so vehemently just to
increase your own credibility among all these men?
To me, you, that were born chewing your English from you mother's nipples,
do not seem not have a better and more profound linguistic competence than
EP, who has learned it only two years ago, as far as I am concerned.
I cannot see much of a gap between the two of you, actually.
You are no star, though.
I have met many women like you that try to put in the shade other women just
to promote themselves.
In college they are known as the desperate, less attractive ones.
Sonia
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Peter Howard <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: Reader's reports made public
> >Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 21:44:07 +0100
> >
> >On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Douglas Barbour wrote...
> >
> > >On the other hand, I definitely would agree that those letters are
> >supposed
> > >to be, and for many fo the writers involved should be, private.
> >
> >I'm in two minds about this. My first reaction was to agree with Hugh
> >and Douglas. But then it occurred to me that what was happening was
> >neither more nor less than someone publishing their opinion about
> >someone else's work. Is that reprehensible? It depends on whether
> >there's some implied confidentiality agreement between a publisher and
> >the person who submits work to them. Perhaps there should be. Certainly,
> >if an editor to whom I'd unsuccessfully submitted work published what he
> >thought of it, I'd be upset. But then I'd be upset if someone who'd met
> >me and didn't like me had their biography published and their dislike of
> >me was mentioned.
> >
> >If a biographer wasn't allowed to say anything that portrayed any of the
> >people the subject had encountered in other than glowing colours,
> >there'd be precious few biographies, and no interesting ones.
> >Does/should the work of an unpublished poet have some special status in
> >this regard?
> >
> >--
> >Peter
> >
> >http://www.hphoward.demon.co.uk/poetry/
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|