david, i find your message offensive. i'm heartily sick of calls to
exclude.
i would have thought that if anyone ought to be excluded then hugh
tolhurst's "language" ought to lead to hugh being excluded rather than
his target. or are you suggesting that his behaviour is somehow less
offensive than pseusanne's?
what sorts of prejudice do we need in order to regard hugh's message as
"understandable".
if hugh's blunt message is to be regarded as "understandable" then it
would seem that the hostility towards pseusanne is becoming morbidly or
uncontrolledly emotional for reasons which are not clear.
steve
on mon, 24 jul 2000 15:26:40 +0100
the entity known as "david kennedy" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> I am heartily sick of this person and this subject and resultant
>> postings.
>>
>> Her postings/her personae's postings and others' responses to them
>> have for me ruined this list as a place to be. Even though I can
>> filter out EP/personae postings, I still have to endure others'
>> responses to them - eg Hugh Tolhurst's expletive. I don't think I
>> should have to turn on my PC and have to read this sort of language -
>> whatever the reason or context.
>>
>> I would like to make a formal and public request to John Kinsella to
>> remove her and to draw a line under the topics she has engendered.
---------------------
http://www.fluoro.org
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|