JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2000

PODIATRY 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: sagittal plane theory revisited

From:

freeman Churchill <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:04:18 -0300

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (60 lines)

[log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 4/11/00 9:07:29 AM %GMT_MINUS_08_A_DAYLIGHT%,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> 
> <<
>  >>I am not satisfied with the sagittal plane blockade explanation for the
>  following reasons
> 
>  1. When you see a blockade supposedly caused by a functional hallux limitus
>  there is relatively more weight on the heel.  This is counter to what is
>  expected.>>
> 
>  This may be counter to what YOU would expect, but this is precisely what
>  happens.  The problem here is the model in which your biomechanical
> decisions
>  are made.  I have explained the rationale in detail previously.  Simply put,
>  if you can't step forward, you can't lift the heel.
>   >>
> Howard, I agree with you that we are beginning to repeat ourselves and I will
> agree with you that we will have to agree to disagree on the rest of the
> points in my last post.  In the above comment, where do the forces come from
> that limit heel lift?  If the tendency is to move and it doesn't move a force
> or a moment has to limit the motion.
> 
> Respectfully,
> Eric Fuller
Dear Dr. Fuller,
Does not one of Newton's Laws say that a body in motion will remain in
motion unless acted upon by an other  force?  If a foot attached to a
body moving forward hits a buttress  (locked 1st MTP jt) then the locked
1st MTP jt against the ground Is the other force. The body then takes
the  next path of least resistance which would be across, as an example,
the subtalalr joint. I visited a  local beach a couple of years ago with
my family where I saw a surfguard doing his inservice traing in his
barefeet in the  wet sand.  Looking at his footprints and observing his
gait, I thought as I watched him carrying the rescue board, "That guy is
perfectly straight and displays no gait anomalies. (?) " (when you say
it to yourself you don't care if you misspell them!)  Quite amazingly, I
saw him again within the month, after finishing at the beach, at my
office.  Walking barefoot on my floor he pronated badly , locking up at
the 1st MTP.  Heel pain,  arch shin pain and low back pain. He resumed a
normal existence off the beach.  I was amazed at the differences I saw,
almost as much as having remembering what I saw the previous month to
begin with! "Why such a difference?" I asked myself.  I may be miles off
with my answer to my own question but I realized his 1st MTP joint met
with no obstructing resistance, but rather with the very forgiving sand
which  did not give need for any other planal compensation.  I realize
quite soberly that it was 'an experiment of one' but have since
considered  since the restricting environments where we spend most of
our "poorly shod" lives.  Hard, flat, bound and unforgiving.  The other
possibility of course is that when you're on the beach with the babes,
the waves, the rays, a board under your arm heading for open water,
dude, you can do no wrong."
Sincerely ,
Freeman Churchill, Certified Pedorthist (Canada)


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager