JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  2000

MINING-HISTORY 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Pbl.Research Accuracy

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 28 Oct 2000 09:06:22 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)


Dear All,

Further to my last on the above matter, I must advise of another example for 
historical fact reasons. 

Now, before I start, I wish to make very clear that I am not having a go at 
the author or this particular book, it is simply a classic example. The book 
is really well worth having, since the photographic records are extremely 
good, and they, and most of the text will make excellent reference for the 
future. The pbl. I refer to is British Small Mines (North). 

I make reference to the Cambokeels Mine surface plan on p.27, it is 
completely wrong. I spent probably about 6 years 'hovering' around this 
place, and know/knew every square inch of the site: those with the plan in 
front of them & who know the site the following will be obvious, but for 
others, as follows:-  

There were two road entrances to the site at an opposing angle to the one 
shown. The distance between the two being approx. 200yds.. The other entrance 
came 'onto' the site approx. where "Up" is shown on the plan. To use maybe a 
better description, North being the top of the page, the whole site (but not 
the A689 road), needs moving from N to S to N to E & S to W. The main decline 
and the adit shown on the plan do not run up the Dale as shown, but in fact 
went underneath the main road directly into the hillside. The Power House 
(more correctly the Compressor House - 1 Bellis & Morcom (main), & an At.Cop 
(I think), & a standby geny), was approx. 30ft to the left of the decline 
entrance - not positioned as shown on the plan. The River Wear seems to have 
totally changed course on the plan, since it was the boundary for the length 
of the site approx. in line with the road (approx. as a guide - in fact what 
is shown as the fence can be regarded as the river). The magazine was by the 
river (approx.18ft above - as was the whole site), and was situated 
'opposite' the Workshops, but set back from same about 300ft, and was behind 
a bank of spoil. As to the other buildings: no lorries were ever loaded 
directly from the decline gantry; a loading shovel was used to blend and mix 
from the separate stope 'hoppers' to keep run-of-mine fluorspar as constant a 
grade as possible for the mill - quartz presented a problem here sometimes, 
and it ruins pumps & pipes in mills! - particularly sharp bends. (Yes, I know 
there are special linings & pump impellers now!). I have to say I do not 
remember "Eleven unloading chutes each side": I remember 5 or six, because 
the protective cover sheets were rather heavy to lift! The tubs were in fact 
emptied into what were three bays either side of the gantry. I have extensive 
photographic records of this place, above and below ground - as also most of 
the working Weardale mines of the 80's, including the Rookhope Plant and the 
Frosterley Plant. It is a shame that the Redburn Mine was missed out of this 
book though.

Now, again, I am not having a go at the author of this book, & again, it is 
well worth buying since the p.graphs. are a very good record to have, 
particularly so of the coal sites the author visited, some of which I have no 
knowledge of whatsoever: but coal is not my field, and these were out of my 
area (except the Alston area... where the Flow Edge mine seems to have been 
forgotten (I have p.graphs of it also) - I sold them quite a bit of plant 
once (as also another small oper. in the District), but Flow Edge no longer 
exists sadly - & not because I sold them plant I might add!!! 

All these sorts of errors can so easily be avoided if proper proof-reading is 
done by the right people. I can mention quite a few other books, but I shall 
not do so since enough has been said on the matter I think. One of the best 
books I have purchased recently is the new one on Ecton and it's surrounding 
mines: a superb example of how it should be done - it is thorough. As I said 
before, nobody likes criticism, but if same produces a faultless (or as near 
as is possible) publication, then there is not only more pride in the pbl. 
for the author, but everybody gets the right facts. I know now that when I 
ultimately produce my book, there will be 100's looking with magnifying 
glasses for faults!!!!! - good, that will make me even more careful in it's 
writing and production!!!!!!!!!!!!  

Spelling again - the ABC button is useful! Sory, cood not risist the 
mension!!!!!!!!

Kind Regards To All,  Bernard


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager