JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIHNN Archives


LIHNN Archives

LIHNN Archives


LIHNN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIHNN Home

LIHNN Home

LIHNN  2000

LIHNN 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Harrogate HC2000

From:

Gorrell Fiona <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Gorrell Fiona <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:53:48 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (154 lines)

Hi Folks,

Apologies for the delay in reporting back from Harrogate, but here it is at
last!

My general impressions of the conference were that it was, well organised,
with a good spread of issues, and an extensive series of exhibition halls.
On the whole well worth attending, for anyone thinking of going next year.

Issues covered during the day:

1) What UK nurses, midwives and health visitors want from an Internet
service?
Rod Ward from the School of Nursing at the University of Sheffield reported
on his recent survey on nurses use of the internet.  He compiled a list of
what nurses wanted from the internet.  The top categories were - nurse
focused sites relevant to specialties, peer reviewed articles and
bibliographic databases.   They were less interested in jobs, local
information and mailing lists.    (Nurses unlike librarians don't see email
discussion lists as professionally useful!)  Rod concluded that usage of the
internet amongst nurses was increasing and that the internet was seen as an
important componet of available resources.  
Of particular interest to librarians was Rod's comment that the future
development of services was dependant upon collaboration between Higher
Education and the NHS.  He announced that the NELH had submitted a bid in
conjunction with OMNI/BIOMED and the result should be known in May 2000.   A
further interesting point was the feedback he received from his survey
respondents that community nurses had difficulties gaining access to
libraries out of hours.  It was also a sore point amongst nurses that Pubmed
is free but Cinahl isn't. 

2) Nursing and health informatics education and training: problems disguised
as opportunities?
Pete Murray from Telematics Consultancy highlighted existing problems with
informatics education as; lack of consensus on programme content between
different institutions, limited access to resources, nursing faculty are not
taught to teach IT and there is no relationship between education and
student knowledge.  Pete then highlighted current access issues; the NHSnet
is generally not available at ward level, the amount of home access to the
internet is increasing, there is a high level of internet use amongst GP but
not amonst practice nurses and there are few clinical IT systems.  In terms
of HE, he commented, that there were a few isolated visionary individuals
but that too many tutors don't use informatics themselves and therefore do
not integrate informatics into the curriculum.  In colleges of nursing there
is a serious lack of informatic skilled educators.  (A gap in the market
which should be filled by Librarians - unfortunately this was not a question
and answer session so I didn't get the chance to make my point known to the
audience). EPR and telehealth are increasing training needs.  The NHS
Education, Training and Development Strategy is a major development in
meeting unmet training needs.

3) The Internet "haves" and "have nots" in nursing
Denis Antony, Professor of Nursing Informatics at De Montford University,
talked about the lack of internet provision in developing countries.   The
key difficulties are; the lack of penetration of telecommunications and the
fact that access to the internet is only for the very rich.  These problems
are compounded by political turmoil, low literacy and high infant mortality.
This compares with the USA where 70% graduates and 70% of households with
more than 30,000$ have access to the internet.  Denis concludes that in the
USA most internet users are highly educated.  There is a similar pattern of
usage in the UK where 59% Class AB have access compared to  only 14% Class
DE.   The pattern of access to the NHSnet is still very patchy.  For
instance at Glenfield all wards have terminals with access to the intranet
whereas at Leicester and Rutland Community hospital there are no access to
terminals.  However even where ward based access is available seniority
plays a major part in deciding who gets access.  Ward staff are less likely
to have access than Senior staff.  Denis identified a resources shortfall
within the NHS in terms of training budgets and terminals.  He then went on
to discuss the fact that in 1998 no national organisations from the 8
poorest countries in the worlds had access to the internet.  However this
was inversely related to their enthusiasm for the internet.  The poorest
countries are those with a special enthusiasm for internet access.  They see
the internet as a means to overcome the problems caused by their
geographical isolation, poverty and sparsely distributed population.
Therefore a lack of internet access is not explained by apathy or ignorance.
In 2000 the very poorest countries are still without access to email or
internet.  The USA has more telephoned lines that China, Russia, India,
Pakistan, Indonesia and Bangladesh combined.   Poverty is still the major
issue in internet access.   Denis then posed the moral question - is it a
duty for very rich countries to assist the poorest countries to get access
to the internet?  He proposed that the richest countries should nominate
which poorer countries they would assist.  There was a short question and
answer session at the end.  A regional librarian, from one of the southern
regions, made the point that it was patronising to only consider what we can
give to developing countries without first considering what they can give to
us.

4) Identification of critical success factors in the implementation of
clinical governance within primary care
Beverley Ellis from the University of Central Lancashire discussed her study
of the clinical governance framework within 2 PCG's in Lancashire. She
highlighted the critical success factors for clinical governance as a core
activity in terms of ; consensus on objectives, effective and continuous
dialogue, benchmarking, information management, learning from experience,
responsive and participative culture, blame free environment and clinical
time available.  She discussed the significance of conflicting management
and clinical agendas and the difficulties of balancing contrasting agendas.
She argued that clinical staff would not participate in management agenda's
unless they perceived a clear benefit for themselves.  She emphasised the
importance of managers creating a cultural environment where knowledge was
seen as a source of competitive strength.  In her opinion the Contingency
Theory i.e. there is no optimum state only that which is contingent, is a
key success factor. Her concluding comment was that the management of change
always takes time and resources.   

5) Passion, evaluation and health informatics: the vital ingredients of
clinical governance for primary care
Carol Cowley from Newcastle University highlighted the significance of
professional self regulation and the life long learning agenda within the
clinical governance framework.  She then went on to discuss the key elements
of clinical judgement within primary care. Judgements were person based,
using diagnostic labels, based upon the judicious balance of certainty and
probability and intuition v analytic thought and were time based.  Carol
then described the cognitive continuim underlying clinical judgements.  The
continuim is intuitivie, peer aided, system aided, quasi experiment,
controlled trial and scientific experiment.  Carol also analysed the key
elements of knowledge - knowledge for action and  knowledge in action.  In
terms of clinicians learning from experience, the key factors were,
reflection, experience, selection, organisation and interpretation.  Carol
finished off by saying that consultations were increasingly  tripartite
consisting of the patient, the clinician and the knowledge support, health
record system. 
 
All in all it was a busy, but informative day.  On my wanders around the
exhibition hall I collected a good range of leaflets from the NHS
Information Authority and the NHS Executive.  These are currently been
distributed around the Bay if anyone is interested in seeing them please
contact either Paul Longbottom (RLI) or Pam Rigden/Jenny Tancock (FGH).

regards

Fiona Gorrell
Librarian
Morecambe Bay Hospitals NHS Trust
Westmorland General Hospital
Burton Rd
Kendal
Cumbria
LA9 7RG

Tel 01539 795234 Fax 01539 795308
[log in to unmask]


 







%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager