JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  2000

ENVIROETHICS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Pre-caution Principle and Lawn Chemicals

From:

"John Foster" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Foster

Date:

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:01:16 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)


Calgary Herald

Wed 17 May 2000 News

Lawn chemical ban urged

Pesticides used to treat lawns, golf courses and parks should be phased out
over five years, says the Liberal-dominated Commons environment committee.

``The committee heard compelling testimony that pesticides pose a threat to
human health and the environment,'' says a report released Tuesday after a
year of research, including hearings with health experts.

Food-related pesticide use should be more tightly controlled to protect
children, Canadians should be better informed and more pesticide research is
needed, adds the report.

It suggests new cosmetic pesticides should not be registered and current
ones should be gradually removed.

``Dandelions don't pose a threat to health,'' said committee chairman and
Liberal MP Charles Caccia. ``But herbicides do -- particularly to
children.''

``We have found compelling evidence that pesticides are threats to human
health and the environment, and such evidence keeps accumulating,'' said
Caccia, a Toronto Liberal.

``For instance, a National Cancer Institute study in the U.S. says children
whose parents use pesticides in their homes and gardens are six times more
likely to get leukemia'' than children in homes without pesticides, he said,
adding that pesticides are also linked to non-Hodgkins lymphoma and possibly
breast cancer.

The report also says agriculture is too dependent on such chemicals for a
similar phase-out, but Canada should invest more in organic farming. Caccia
said he hopes it will influence the government as it moves to update
30-year-old pesticide legislation.

Health Minister Allan Rock, who is expected to bring in new legislation
soon, said he will study the committee report. A 1999 brief of planned
changes to the law obtained by the Canadian Press made no specific mention
of how pesticides affect children and wildlife.

The Canadian Public Health Association, Ontario College of Family
Physicians, Canadian Institute of Child Health and the Learning Disabilities
Association of Canada all said children's behaviour and learning skills are
affected by pesticides, Caccia said.

Kids are most vulnerable because their smaller size means greater exposure
as they play on sprayed grass or eat treated food.

Pesticides are most often breathed in, absorbed through the skin or consumed
in produce.

There may not be a scientific ``smoking gun'' linking the chemicals with
health effects, but there's enough hint of harm to warrant precautions,
Caccia added.

The committee urges a re-evaluation -- according to today's stricter
standards -- of all pesticides approved before 1995 and a ban on such
products where safer alternatives exist.

In the meantime, Canadians should carefully wash their produce and parks
departments should stop spraying, it says.

A group representing pesticide manufacturers criticized the report, saying
it ignores the benefits of their products and Canada's ``stringent and
modern regulatory system.''

The report gives Canadians ``half of the story,'' said Lorne Hepworth,
president of the Crop Protection Institute of Canada, representing pesticide
manufacturers and distributors.

A cosmetic ban could lower real estate values, devastate golf courses and
parks, and spawn pests that may spread to agriculture, critics warned.

Those relying on Canada's $7-billion-a-year landscaping industry are also
worried.

``It would make life a lot more difficult for them in terms of lawn care,''
said Wayne Roberts, spokesman for the Landscape Ontario Horticultural Trades
Association.

``A lot might no longer be in business. And I doubt it would be a
sustainable system'' because reliable, non-chemical options aren't widely
available, he said.

Current science shows pesticides are a relatively low risk in a chemical
world, Roberts added.

``We'd like to see a balance . . . We don't see that we're out there killing
children.''

The main changes in the law, the committee said, should be:

- To protect the most ``vulnerable populations'' --mainly children and
sensitive wildlife species. (For instance, frogs are very easily poisoned by
chemicals in their water.)

- To ban ``cosmetic''weed- and insect-killers without waiting for absolute
proof that they are dangerous.




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager