JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2000

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL] Government ineffective in chasing Net crime, executives say

From:

John Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:07:27 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (98 lines)

[Emailed to a 'friend']:

Government ineffective in chasing Net crime, executives say 
By The Associated Press
Special to CNET News.com
April 6, 2000, 10:05 a.m. PT
URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-1648223.html 

STANFORD, Calif.--Threats from cyberterrorists have become almost routine at
Oracle, the leading developer of database
software. 

Last month, someone in Sudan tried to blackmail the Redwood Shores,
Calif.-based company with a threat to break into its system unless it paid
an undisclosed sum of money. 

A clear case for the FBI? Not at Oracle--or at hundreds of other high-tech
victims of Internet cyberstalking. 

"We've notified them of a couple of threats, but we didn't expect them to
take any action," said Bill Maimone, Oracle's vice president of server
technologies. "It seems so unlikely that they'd be able to do something." 

As high-tech executives know, the Justice Department lacks the staff to
investigate and prosecute most hackers. Many companies also are reluctant to
undergo government scrutiny; they've got too many secrets. 

As a result, cybercriminals are breaking into or paralyzing Web sites with
little fear of retribution, costing the industry hundreds of millions of
dollars. 

At a Stanford University Law School conference on cybercrime yesterday,
Attorney General Janet Reno pleaded for greater cooperation between the
private and public sectors. 

"It seems to me that we all have a common goal--to keep the nation's
computer network secure, safe and reliable," Reno told the assembled CEOs
and prosecutors. 

Many company leaders were unconvinced. 

"High-tech businesses know they can't count on the Justice Department to
handle their complaints," said John Palafoutas, a senior vice president of
the American Electronics Association. "They know they must take care of
their own security." 

For the past four years, the Clinton administration has asked Congress for
additional staff to prosecute computer crime. To date, the answer has been a
consistent refusal. There was just one cybercrime prosecution for every 50
private industry complaints in 1998, according to the latest Justice
Department figures. 

"We're only able to respond to a limited number of the complaints we receive
because we're starved for resources," said Associate Deputy Attorney General
John Bentivoglio. 

While funding for prosecutors remains static, computer crime has quadrupled
over the past three years, according to a survey by the FBI and San
Francisco's Computer Security Institute. 

Of the hacking victims--most often corporations and government agencies--75
percent said it cost an average of $1 million per intrusion to investigate,
repair and secure their systems. Corporations spent $7.1 billion in 1999 on
security to protect themselves against cyberattacks, and the bill could
reach $17 billion by 2003, according to Internet analysts at Aberdeen Group
in Boston. 

Hackers know authorities are overwhelmed. 

Two months have passed with no arrests in the Feb. 8 electronic assault that
crippled Web sites at 10 major computer companies, including Silicon Valley
powerhouses eBay, Yahoo and E*Trade. 

eBay, an Internet auction site with more than 4.1 million items up for sale
at any given time, fights a constant battle against hacking, fraud and
illegal deals. 

"We only take the most serious matters to the FBI. They investigated a few,
but there haven't been any prosecutions," said eBay's general counsel,
Robert Chesnut. "If the government is going to come out and vow action in
these sorts of cases, they need to provide resources, not just the
promises." 

Companies such as eBay and Oracle rely on the help of private consultants to
combat hackers--a decision that also helps keep their problems from being
publicized. 

"Information-sharing is a risky proposition with less than clear benefits,"
said Harris Miller, president of the Information Technology Association of
America. "Companies are understandably reluctant to share sensitive
proprietary information about
prevention practices, intrusions and actual crimes with either government
agencies or competitors." 



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager