thanks to everyone that replied. it now
works. the machine is the college central
unix system and i hit the odd funny with
length of the search path with setenv now and
again, depending on what i'm doing.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:17:45 -0800 (PST) Chuck Fisher
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > A colleague and I are currently looking at nag f95
> > and sun f90 running under Solaris 7.
> >
> > I have tried the following
> >
> > f90 -xarch=v9a filename.f90
> >
> > and generated the following error message (i've cut
> > it down)
> >
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol in file
> > sqrtl
> /usr/local/packages/SUNWspro/lib/v9/libfsu.so
> > nint
> /usr/local/packages/SUNWspro/lib/v9/libfsu.so
> > hypotf
> /usr/local/packages/SUNWspro/lib/v9/libfsu.so
> >
> > lots deleted
> >
> > s
> /usr/local/packages/SUNWspro/lib/v9/libfsu.so
> > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to a.out
> > gum%
> >
> >
> > is this
> >
> > 1. an rtfm problem for me?
> > 2. possible incomplete installation?
>
> These are link-time messages that indicate that some library functions
> can't be found.
>
> It sounds like an incomplete installation. Is this from the "Early
> Access" that Sun is currently conducting? It helps us if you use
> "-V" along with all other options used when compiling to determine
> what is happening. It's possible to specify options that conflict,
> but this sounds like an incomplete installation. The Early Access
> website has specific packages that need to be installed for 64-bit
> (v9 and v9a) development.
>
> Chuck
> --
> Chuck Fisher +1-650-786-9317
> Sun Internet Application and Performance Tools Support
> [log in to unmask] | [log in to unmask]
>
-------------------
Ian Chivers
[log in to unmask]
* This e-mail message was sent with Execmail V5.0 *
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|