(sorry, I sent the previous message before I finished writing it...)
"Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Lycra(R)" wrote:
>
>
> Your arguments are well supported. However, to play the "devil's advocate"
> I could argue that your engineer (and I am one)
I am one too :-)
> will investigate further the
> "wrong algorithm" if the results are completely trash. If this is not the case
> he will trust the results, hence he has a problem.
>
It depends on the definition of a "wrong" result. From a scientific point of view, of course I don't really advocate this way of doing things. But I must say that from a practical point of view, such a "try/error" approach is not so stupid.
--
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Pierre Hugonnet | mail....CGG |
| | 1, rue Leon Migaux |
| R&D Data Processing | 91341 MASSY cedex |
| | FRANCE |
| COMPAGNIE GENERALE DE GEOPHYSIQUE | phone...(33) 164 47 45 59 |
| Paris Processing Centre | fax.....(33) 164 47 32 49 |
| http://www.cgg.com | [log in to unmask] |
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------+
My opinions are not necessarily those of CGG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|