Having been kindly alerted to my ignorance I want you all to know that I
was completely wrong in one of my two comments earlier. I was just too
lazy to open the book and double-check before I wrote the message, which isn't
excusable.
Thanks to Bill for pointing this out in such a polite manner.
I hope my other comment was correct...
/Nils
Bill said:
> Hi Nils,
> The numerical KIND values for complex are defined to be those of the
> corresponding precision reals. Thus, there is an implicit guarantee
> that the values are the same. In your example above (dp == wp) is
> .true. .
>
> Cheers, Bill
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|