Would the first example be valid, or did I completely goof up? :-) If
so, then I would have to agree with Lawrie Schonfelder, though I do not
normally consider myself an iconoclast. :-)
Richard Maine wrote:
> Alvaro Fernandez writes:
>
> > if (COND2) goto A
> ....
> > I realize GOTO is "bad", but as it is not illegal,
>
> Yes, this use is illegal. GOTO is *NOT* allowed to reference
> construct names. You may go to only a numeric statement number.
> (Well, there's the obsolete assigned goto, but that's yet again
> another thing - it still has nothing to do with construct names).
>
> --
> Richard Maine
> [log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|