Aleksandar Donev wrote:
>
> I have already checked out Sun's fpp. I also read the ISO specifications of CoCo, and I am not very happy with either.
COCO *is* a finished standard. It's done. It's over.
fpp was constrained in an attempt to win votes (the committee wanted *less* not more functionality; COCO has much less ;<).
> at all tell you how
> say recursive or nested macros are treated, which is a *very* important topic.
File an RFE.
> I like the f90ppr of M. Olagnon as a proposal because:
By all means use whatever you like, but it's moot for Fortran Standardization.
--
Keith H. Bierman [log in to unmask]
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
901 San Antonio Road UMPK 31-101
Palo Alto, California 94303
650 688-1995x102voice|650 321-9175fax
<speaking for myself, not Sun*> Copyright 2000
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|