JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90  2000

COMP-FORTRAN-90 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Opening a non-existing file is not an error?

From:

"Craig T. Dedo" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Craig T. Dedo

Date:

Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:44:49 -0500

Content-Type:

multipart/signed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines) , smime.p7s (86 lines)

Dear Bertrand:

Bertrand Meltz wrote:

> I thought that by having the IOSTAT=error_condition,
> I would detect whether I'm opening a file that does not exist.
>
> Apparently I was wrong.

    Yes, you were wrong.  See below.

>
>
> In my code, I have :
>
> open( unit=...., ..., IOSTAT=error_condition)
> if ( error_condition == 0 )
>    ! read the file
>    ...
> end if
>
> it appears that even though the file does not exist, I get
> error_condition = 0,
> and the my reading of the files fails.

    Yes, this is perfectly standard-conforming.  In fact, this is how most
compilers behave.

>
>
> I have the same behaviour with 3 different compilers ( IBM, SUN and
> Compaq/TRU64).
> I searched the F95 standard, but it does not say explicitly (or not
> explicitly enough for me) whether opening a non-existing file should
> be an error.
> Does anybody ahve the final word about that?
>
> B. Meltz
>

    You need to look in BOTH section 9.3.4.2 of the Fortran 95 AND the
reference manual of your favorite compiler.

    Section 9.3.4.2 covers the STATUS= specifier.  Here is some of the text.
[Begin section 9.3.4.2]
9.3.4.2  STATUS= specifier in the OPEN statement
The scalar-default-char-expr shall evaluate to OLD, NEW, SCRATCH, REPLACE, or
UNKNOWN.  If OLD is specified, the file shall exist.  If NEW is specified, the
file shall not exist.

Successful execution of an OPEN statement with NEW specified creates the file
and changes the status to OLD.  If REPLACE is specified and the file does not
already exist, the file is created and the status is changed to OLD.  If
REPLACE is specified and the file does exist, the file is deleted, a new file
is created with the same name, and the status is changed to OLD.
        . . .
If UNKNOWN is specified, the status is processor dependent.  If this specifier
is omitted, the default value is UNKNOWN.
[End of section 9.3.4.2]

    If the STATUS= specifier does not appear, the value of STATUS is UNKNOWN
and the compiler can open the file any way that it likes.  In almost every
case, if the STATUS is UNKNOWN, real Fortran compilers check to see that the
file exists.  If it does exist, it opens the file with STATUS=OLD.  If it does
not exist, it opens the file with STATUS=NEW.

    This behavior is not required by the Fortran standard, but it is very much
a de-facto "standard" enforced by the laws of the marketplace.

--
----------
Sincerely,
Craig T. Dedo                                          Internet:
[log in to unmask]
Elmbrook Computer Services                 Voice Phone:  (262) 783-5869
17130 W. Burleigh Place                        Fax Phone:     (262) 783-5928
Brookfield, WI   53005-2759                   Disclaimer:     These opinions
are mine alone.
USA                                                         They do NOT
represent any organization.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -- Benjamin Franklin (1759)


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager