William F Mitchell writes:
> Right. I have Section 16 from J3/99-007R2 and would accept what it says over
> what is in the other 3 reports. I expected it would be basically the same as
> N1277 + N1298 + N1299, but haven't compared them carefully yet.
I don't think they are particularly close, though admitedly I haven't
looked at N1277 for quite a while.
P.S. J3/00-007 should (I hope) be out later this month. At least
thats what I've promised other people. It has/(will have) 2 meetings
worth of updates because I didn't do a revision between the last 2 meetings.
--
Richard Maine
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|