On 2000-11-30, at 14:10 -0600, Kurt W Hirchert wrote:
KWH: It's potentially worse than that -- the author may have had his own
KWH: Reply-To: header. If the list Reply-To: replaced it, you may have hunt
KWH: through his sig or other such sources to find the "right" address to paste
KWH: into the To: field of your reply.
KWH:
KWH: P.S. I see the list inserted a Reply-To: header on your
KWH: message. Unfortunately, it's value was one that resulted in an _extremely_
KWH: ugly To: field when I replied, so I still need to cut and paste, even in
KWH: the common case.
KWH:
KWH: --
KWH: Kurt W Hirchert [log in to unmask]
KWH: UIUC Department of Atmospheric Sciences +1-217-265-0327
KWH:
I can quite gladly say that I don't find any problem now. I use pine 4.30 and
it offers me a lot of flexibility. Now when I replied to this message I was
asked:
Use "Reply-To:" address instead of "From:" address?
Saying [y]es would mean that the message would go to the list, and [n]o would
mean that it goes to the sender.
p.s. Kurt: You seem to use Eudora. You have sigdashes that look pretty much
like the ones that you get in pine, but there's a difference. Kindly change it
to "dash dash space" instead of "dash dash". Look below, for instance, in my
signature.
--
Mohit Agarwal ([log in to unmask])
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|