Hello,
I strongly second (third? ) this suggestion.
Phillip Helbig wrote:
>
> > On 2000-11-29, at 20:17 +0100, Phillip Helbig wrote:
> >
> > PH: Most (all?) email software will reply to the Reply-To: header
> > PH: preferentially, if it exists, overriding the From: header. If the From:
> > PH: header is visible, this would show the identity of the sender, though
> > PH: this should be obvious from the message itself, if the sender deems it
> > PH: important. (Some email software might construct a new From: header from
> > PH: the Reply-To: header, but the effect is the same. The main thing is
> > PH: that it is clear to the user whom he is sending (how many) messages to,
> > PH: but this is mainly a problem of the user's email software and only to a
> > PH: lesser extent that of the format of the list.)
> >
> > Well, I guess that you weren't quite able to follow what I'd said.
> >
> > What I meant was: A "Reply to:" header should be constructed in the mails
> > that are recieved from the list (this list!). Right now, there's no such
> > thing.
>
> Actually, this IS what I was referring to. Messages received from the
> list should have the list email address in the Reply-To: (or From:)
> header.
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.
|