David can speak for himself, but for what it's worth this - what you're
saying Chris - is what, on reflecction, i took him to mean, but not what I
first took him to mean
L
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Goode" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "david bircumshaw" <[log in to unmask]>; "the moshpit"
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 23 May 2000 09:33
Subject: Re: [Re: Re:BritPuke]
| The prevalence of the likeable Thomas Lynch on the BBC I think is more
likely
| an index of the fact that he has a book out which he is plugging. It is
about
| death yet he is a happy little fellow in a bow tie.
|
| I hazard he won't be quite so prevalent in a couple of months' time.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Goode" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Nate and Jane Dorward" <[log in to unmask]>; "John Tranter"
<[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 23 May 2000 09:42
Subject: Re: [Re: berk? ]
| I
| could probably call my dad a berk and not be disinherited, for example -
| unless I did it consistently and constantly by telephone in the middle of
the
| night.
and if you consistently and constantly telephone your father in the middle
of the night, you'd be a complete... er...
you didn't tell me you had an inheritance; I've always admired you, you know
L
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|