JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BALLADS Archives


BALLADS Archives

BALLADS Archives


BALLADS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BALLADS Home

BALLADS Home

BALLADS  2000

BALLADS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: (Fwd) Modal songs

From:

Carol Thompkins <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 06 Feb 2000 13:07:30 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (60 lines)

Hi Simon,

"Nevertheless, I still have a difficulty:
are you implying that we cannot determine the mode of a melody without
adding harmony? If so, that's an important principle that I was unaware
of."

In my music theory classes, I was always taught to look at the entire
structure of a piece rather than the melody line.  I don't know whether
this is applicable to folk/pop music but I would suspect that it is. 
One of the first things we did was to determine the harmonic structure
and key of a piece.  Even the most sophisticated of classical music
(except contemporary 20th century) at least started on an established
key with predominant I IV and V (or i iv V if minor) in most cases. 
When getting into the Impressionistic era (Debussy, Ravel, Faure) the
modal systems came back into vogue so if you saw an unusual harmonic
sequence or tons of accidentals that was a clue that you might consider
a mode OR a whole-tone scale OR a pentatonic scale  In other words, the
harmony got you on the highway, and the melody found the address.

"My consideration of the Beatles' tunes was done by taking them away
from
their musical settings and dealing with them in isolation, on the basis
that
there are many quite different ways of arranging a tune. I quite accept
that
the musical settings that the Beatles provided may not have been in the
least modal. But doesn't the same thing happen with folk songs when sung
by
pop groups or arranged (say) for orchestra?"

It shouldn't matter unless the underlying harmonic structure is totally
re-done, in which case the piece would be too altered to recognize.  Of
course there are court cases where composers have been sued because of
the stealing of a melody line and putting a different harmony under it. 
One of the most interesting (and frustrating) aspects of music analysis
is that there are no absolute rules to follow - ie, if the arranger or
composer WANTS to put in some strange borrowed chord, he/she can without
the music police coming after them :-)

  If you do treat the Beatles
tunes I mention extracted from their harmonic settings I don't see why
you
can't consider them as modal. "Yesterday", for example, has no
accidentals
in the melody line. - which brings me back to my original question.

I don't have the music for Yesterday, but when I played the melody on
the piano making sure I ended in E I used F# and G# in the ascending
"all my troubles"  E F# G# A - then when the melody descended, the F#
and G# were natural.  This tells me immediately that when finishing on
E, you are playing in the key of a melodic minor.  The scale goes like
this:  ascending:  a b c d e f# g# a  then descending: a g f e d c b a
Does this agree with your melody?

Carol


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2023
August 2022
July 2022
January 2022
November 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
December 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
October 2016
May 2016
October 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
January 2014
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
September 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
July 2011
May 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager