Thanks for the compliment. One was meant to infer from my message that I
thought Records Manager (Compliance) was reasonable, rather than the more
amorphous Compliance Officer.
Not that I'm gonna lose any sleep over the misunderstanding.
R
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephenson,M [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:35 PM
> To: 'Simon McKeon'; 'Schofield, Richard'; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: The Name Game
>
> Dear All,
>
> Top of the morning to you all (afternoon now I suppose). Another Friday,
> another exciting topic we can all get out teeth into in a
> winding-down-to-the-weekend way!
>
> Not that I want to disagree with Rich or Simon (who are both top blokes),
> but isn't the title, Compliance Officer, too broad. It should really be
> Records' Compliance Officer or Information Compliance Officer (since the
> DP/FoI Commissioner will be the Information Commissioner soon). Otherwise
> the job title may lead people to believe the post-holder was responsible
> for
> all compliance within the certain public sector organisation including H&S
> and all that mallarkey.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Matthew
>
>
> Matthew Stephenson
> Records Manager
> Room H616
> London School of Economics
> Houghton Street
> London WC2A 2AE
>
> Tel: 020 7955 6481
> Fax: 020 7404 5510
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon McKeon [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:18 PM
> > To: 'Schofield, Richard'; [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: RE: The Name Game
> >
> > I agree with Richard.
> > Broadcasting companies also have compliance officers who make sure
> their
> > companies comply with the ITC Programme Code. By the very nature of
> their
> > job they have to be authoritative and if telling people what to do is
> seen
> > as being stroppy, then so be it. The consequences of not complying can
> be
> > very costly indeed.
> >
> > Simon McKeon
> > Records Manager
> > Independent Television Commission
> > Tel: 020 7306 7781
> > Fax: 0207 306 7800
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Schofield, Richard
> > > Sent: Friday, November 03,2000 12:01
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: The Name Game
> > >
> > > "Records Manager (Compliance)" sounds too stroppy.
> > >
> > > Rothschilds has an entire Compliance Department, staffed by Compliance
> > > Officers (mainly lawyers) concerned with financial compliance. I
> > couldn't
> > > possibly comment on their stroppiness, but the priniciple is the same
> > and
> > > the title is short and to the point.
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > ******************
> > > Richard Schofield
> > >
> > > The Rothschild Archive
> > > New Court
> > > St Swithin's Lane
> > > LONDON
> > > EC4P 4DU
> > >
> > > tel. 020 7280 5808
> > > fax 020 7280 5657
> > > http://www.rothschildarchive.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This message is from the Internet
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> > addressed. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
> > swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses".
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|