Peter,
No I do not have a sample. I was hoping that an article has been written about
this already -- no need to reinvent the wheel (the square one I use is just
fine).
I can understand how a good polish and tech can tell structure, carbon levels
and grain flow -- have done this in the past. I'm a four hour drive from the
"good" equipment at the Univ. so most all my work is by , as you say - art.
Richard
Peter Hutchison wrote:
> Richard
>
> Are you saying you have a section? It should not be difficult to assess
> under the microsope what you have got, or has that art disappeared with the
> SEM? I used to get things like that in my practical exams. Where it was made
> is a different matter.
>
> Peter Hutchison
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|