Grzegorz Krzykowski wrote:
>
> Pawel Rowinski wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Very often we deal with the situation that although a probability density
> > functions describe (by their shape) some processes in a reasonable way, the
> > statistical moments do not exist for them. These moments also have very
> > clear interpretation. Does anybody of you have some thoughts on this
> > subject, namely what is the philosophy (or is it any) behind this seemingly
> > obvious fact. Maybe you can recommend some reading about it?
> >
> > Any help/info appreciated.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Dr. Pawel M. Rowinski
> > Institute of Geophysics,
> > Polish Academy of Sciences
> > e-mail [log in to unmask]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nie za bardzo rozumiem czy ta g/esto/s/c istnieje czy nie istnieje?
>
> Je/sli istnieje to jak jest zadana, wzorem ???
>
> A mo/ze natura zjawiska jest taka, /ze mo/zna przypuszcza/c, /ze
> g/esto/s/c istnieje i nie mo/zna jej poda/c wzorem. Mo/ze co/s da si/e
> powiedzie/c bez podawania wzoru.
>
> Momenty mog/a nie istnie/c nawet w/owczas gdy g/esto/s/c istnieje.
>
> Oczywi/scie je/sli chodzi o interpretacj/e to wchodzimy na bardzo
> /sliski grunt.
>
> Je/sli pomiary pochodz/a np. z rozk/ladu Cauchyego to rozwa/zanie
> czego/s takiego jak /srednia z pr/oby (maj/aca bardzo /ladn/a
> interpretacj/e) jest bezpodstawne.
>
> Z powa/zaniem Grzegorz Krzykowski
I'm sorry I sent the reply to the list - it was supposed to be sent to
the author, who is Polish - and that's why the message is in Polish.
My mistake. :)
Grzegorz Krzykowski.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|