JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ADMIN-STUDENT Archives


ADMIN-STUDENT Archives

ADMIN-STUDENT Archives


Admin-Student@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ADMIN-STUDENT Home

ADMIN-STUDENT Home

ADMIN-STUDENT  2000

ADMIN-STUDENT 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: RE: Student loan cheques

From:

Margo Marshall <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:07:08 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (207 lines)


I believe the best solution  would be a carbonned form -so HEI's 
could keep the second sheet (with the students signature on)
and send the top copy back to SLC. At Kingston we do take a 
copy of each form prior to sending back to SLC and have found this 
works well and the information has proved very useful on many 
occasions  - but I agree that it is costly both in staff time and 
money. 
regards
Margo
  
Date sent:      	Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:23:13 -0000
Subject:        	RE: RE: Student loan cheques
From:           	Roger Clark <[log in to unmask]>
To:             	Admin-Student <[log in to unmask]>
Send reply to:  	[log in to unmask]

George

I suspect that this is one of those "balance of advantage" issues.  I am
aware that the cost of photocopying falls on us; but it may well be that
this is still the most cost-effective way to keep track of what you have
done.  Clearly, some people feel that for students to sign on a list as
well/instead gives us more work, especially since we would be dealing with
multiple lists.  With LEA schedules, one can at least ask the student which
LEA and therefore know which list to look on; but we would need to search
several SLC schedules to find a particular student.  But I will make the
point you raise, to see if anyone can come up with a better solution than
photocopying.

Roger Clark
Academic Registrar
University of Reading

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of George Hardie
> Law
> Sent: 14 March 2000 09:09
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: RE: Student loan cheques
>
>
> Roger
>
> It appears that some of our colleagues have taken exception
> to my suggestions. May I remind everyone that my comments
> are merely suggestions, and I do not wish to impose my
> methods of working on others. I merely wish to voice my
> concerns, unlike others who do not have any suggestions
> apart from opposing mine. If anyone has a bright idea on
> how to process loan cheques do let me know.
>
> Incidentally, my office does not have a "less hectic time",
> and I do think that photocopying the counterfoils is a
> ridiculous idea.
>
> Regards
>
> George H Law
> University of North London
>
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:01:49 +0000 Aitken Catherine
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Roger,
> > I agree completely with Sue Cartwright.
> >
> > Catherine Aitken
> > Glasgow Caledonian University
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sue cartwright [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: 13 March 2000 09:49
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Student loan cheques
> >
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > In response to George Law's comments last week I am strongly
> opposed to the
> > suggestion that students sign a schedule.
> >
> > If students have to sign two documents it will severely delay
> the issuing
> > of student loans in September and will increase the queues. This is
> > especially the case in large institutions who are handling the
> distribution
> > of several thousand cheques at the start of the academic year.
> If HEIs wish
> > to photocopy the counterfoils they can do so at a less hectic time.
> >
> > Sue
> >
> >
> >
> >  At 16:41 10/03/2000 +0000, you wrote:
> > >Roger
> > >
> > >As we do not photocopy loan cheques or the counterfoil
> > >after the student has signed and dated it, we are
> > >practically helpless when it comes to problem cases.
> > >
> > >I am opposed to photocopying wholesale for countless
> > >reasons (resources etc), therefore, I would like the SLC to
> > >present cheques in a similar fashion to LEA schedule
> > >sheets. They work perfectly fine and it means we retain a
> > >measure of control and accountability. It wouldn't be too
> > >much trouble to ask students to sign both the cheque and
> > >the schedule sheet. I am aware the SLC wanted to depart
> > >from such a process but I have had many instances where the
> > >SLC themselves have asked for details of a students
> > >signature.
> > >
> > >The second biggest problem we have had this year and I'm
> > >sure many of our colleagues may agree and that is
> > >communications. The SLC have been terrible this year. We
> > >need a direct line to HEI dedicated operators, we need
> > >confirmation of e-mails and a proper system for recording
> > >post and faxes sent to Glasgow. On several occasions this
> > >year I have sent between 3 and 4 faxes for individual
> > >students and virtually accused of not having sent them
> > >by (over worked)SLC operators. This must stop and is simply
> > >down to bad management.
> > >
> > >Regular up dates from the SLC may be asking too much but
> > >this year in particular we haven't seen much in terms of
> > >newsletters or electronic updates. I would be very much
> > >interested in how loans are progressing through the system,
> > >although I fear this may be impossible. However, it would
> > >make our jobs less stressful if we could provide
> > >students with real information and not the SLC party line.
> > >
> > >On another issue I do appreciate the work done by our
> > >colleagues in the SLC and would like to take this
> > >opportunity to express this. My main aim to ensure that
> > >students receive their cheques and I intend to work with
> > >the SLC to do this.
> > >
> > >It would be nice also, if certain SLC staff did not shout
> > >down the phone and talk to me from an outdated John Cleese
> > >(training video) customer care script.
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >
> > >George H Law
> > >University of North London
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:49:28 +0000 Roger Clark
> > ><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have been asked by the DfEE for suggestions for improving
> the process
> > of
> > >> administering student loan cheques this coming autumn.  The
> DfEE is not
> > able
> > >> to make major changes to the system this year, but would be happy to
> > >> consider ways of tweaking the existing arrangements to make
> them go more
> > >> smoothly.  I would be happy to collate suggestions and pass them on.
> > >>
> > >> Roger Clark
> > >> Academic Registrar
> > >> University of Reading
> > >>
> > >
> > >----------------------
> > >George Hardie Law
> > >[log in to unmask]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Sue Cartwright			Tel:  0171 504 2017
> > Director of Student Finance		Fax: 0171 380 7920
> > Registrar's Division			email:
> [log in to unmask]
> > University College London
> > Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT
> >
>
> ----------------------
> George Hardie Law
> [log in to unmask]
>
>

Margo Marshall
Head of Student Advisory Service
Kingston University
Cooper House
40-46 Surbiton Road
Kingston
Surrey KT1 2HX
United Kingdom
Internet:[log in to unmask]
Tel+44(0)181 547 7217
Fax+44(0)181 547 7883 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
August 2023
July 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
February 2022
January 2022
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
July 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager