JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT  2000

ACCESSIBUILT 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: access not accessible

From:

[log in to unmask] (Jim Davis)

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:06:42 -0400 (EDT)

Content-Type:

Multipart/Mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

Text/Plain (82 lines) , Message/RFC822 (82 lines)

Well, of course this is most of what people mean when they express the
difference between "accesible design" and "universal design".  This is
why these 2 largely different terms exist.

"Accessible design" in a purely personal environment of a home, can in
the instance you cite, become sort of segregated design.

Other examples, off the top of my head:

1. -- If a raised toilet seat is attached to the only toilet in the
house (or building), and some visitors cannot use it... then this is a
non-univeral example of "accesible design".

2. -- If a car has special controls attached to it, or blocks attached
to the pedals, etc., which is an example of the olf "rehab design"
taylored to one person's needs, obviously if a friend or family member
for whom those adaptive fittings are a barrier, shares that car and
sometimes needs to drive it, and it's time consuming / difficult / etc.
to remove the devices....that's an example that fits your inquiry.  

(Hats off to the car maker who has the driver's seat's adjustments
programmed into a control system; and it is said to recognise who is
sitting in the seat and "remember" the settings for that person.  Not
"Universal", but like most stuff in htat category, to be more precise
about it -- it  is moving in a "universal-ish" direction..)

2.  -- Any entry access that requires using a fancy "special" device,
(beyone aotomatic or button-controlled dor openers)... like a "LU-LA"
(an ADA Term -- limited use - iomited access lift", in plain English,
one of those inferior Mickey Mouse lifts designed to pinch pennies at
the expense of safety, dignity, etc.).... if we look at the social and
psychological aspects of equal access -- can create access for some
while in effect, in social context, creating a "barrier" for other
PWD's.  

Specifically -- A person for whom steps are a barrier -- who cannot
climb steps, but whose disability is not immediately and obviously
visible to a stranger or facility employee, may either encounter
resistance and discrimination in getting the key for such a lift, or
getting employees to cooperate in some other way (moving loose objects
obstructing the lift, for example)... or even if it's "ready to use" may
not want to put up with being stared at by people (as the list loudly
grinds it's way up... creating an attention-grabbing spectacle) many of
whom are apparently wonding "Why is this noisy device being used by this
person who "doesn't look disabled"?

A few years ago in using my local Public Library, I was directed to use
an unlocked "staff only" lift.... and then once I was up on this
mezzanine, some other official of the library (some big shot with a
white shirt and ti, probably higher ranking thannteh cloerk I'd first
spoken with) with a walkie talkie encountered me waiting for this lift
to get back down, and informed me that I could not use it.  I explained
my mobility disability, which did not matter to him because he could not
see it, and was obviously on a power trip.  He again sdemanded that I
use the stairs to get back down.  With this walkie talkie in his hand,
the implied threat was that he would have me harassed by the cops.  I
had to stick to my rights, and say "I told you... I have a disability
that makes it difficult (I may have added the word "painful" which was
actually none of his business) for me to use stairs, this lift is how I
got up here and this lift is how I am going to go back downstairs".   I
ignored him, fortunately,  he backed off.

To get to the Reference section, requires using an unenclosed and
centrally-located  "LU-LA lift to get up about 8 steps.  Some times, I
don't use the Reference Rom when I need to ....still feeling awkward
about the situation of being stared at by people who think I should not
be using it, and the possibility of again being harassed.... I never
took action against that harassment to make sure it wouldn't happen
again...... though it's on my "to do" list for some day...  

3. --  Improving a home environment taylored to an owner with small
stature, towards being more "universal" or "inclusive"  in order to
accomodate a variety of visitors, is a design problem
that is "doable" in at least several respects.  The parts you mentned...
kitchens, seating.... the possible solutions for converting these from
too-specific "accesible" towards something closer to "universal design"
come to mind, pretty easily.... 
  
Jim Davis


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager