JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT  2000

ACCESSIBUILT 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

terminology

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 3 Jan 2000 15:12:50 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

Hi everyone

It is an interesting debate that has been going on in terms of 
'special needs - to be or not to be' and thanks to Patrick, Andy and 
Judith for the thought provoking discussion. I would like to continue 
the debate, and I have changed the subject heading to 
'terminology'. This is just administrative, but people wanting to 
search back accessibuilt achives can do this by subjects, so I 
thought we'd change.

I feel there is no right or wrong answer to the correct terms of 
disabled, special needs etc. I feel that it comes down to personal 
preference coupled with what Patrick referred to as the 'learning 
curve' because our views change over time. I would like to illustrate 
a few things though that have affected my use of terminology:

1. when Marcus and I started our disability research about 2 years 
ago we were very conscious about terminology, and were also 
aware of our lack of understanding of 'correct terminology' We 
spent time learning what we thought was appropriate, always 
saying 'a person with a disability' (people first) rather than 'the 
disabled person'. We then progressed to 'a person who is visually 
impaired' rather than 'a blind person', then we met and worked with 
Andy, Adrian and Judith. Help, here we were about to undertake 
job interviews for research assistants, most of whom had a 
disability. But we got it sussed, Judith was 3ft something tall, so 
we would abvioulsy refer to her as 'a person of small stature'. But 
then the shock came, we interviewed Judith and she just referred to 
herself as being 'a dwarf'. All our political correctness went out of 
the window, Judith was just into the pragmatics at the end of the 
day, for her own justifiable reasons which she will no doubt explain.

2. 'special needs' for me conjurs up an image of a child who is 
handicapped. My experience is of special needs being a term used 
prediminatly in schools and education authorities when referring to 
children. It also suggests to me a link with someone who is 
handicapped. 
(Note, I don't like the term handicapped, it is something I do not 
use but I can relate to it 20 years ago when it was common 
language)
I feel special needs relates to a term that has been around for a 
long time, and perhaps it is time to move on.

3. the need to take people along with us, or to do things 
incrementally. Again, a couple of examples:

About 6 years ago MENCAP changed the term 'mentally 
handicapped' to 'learning disability' There was a lot of debate. 
Some people kept to mantally handicapped. Some changed to 
learning disability, but the outside world wonders what this means 
because the public have not been educated. Some changed to 
'learning difficulty' because they did not like 'disability'. I would 
suggest that total confusions reigns, and in considering what to 
name something, it is important to recognise what the public will 
understand.

On a recent trip to Cape Town it was interesting to see the signs 
pointing to the toilets as being
'women, men, physically challenged'
I was subsequently sent about 3 photos of these signs from 
colleagues who used the airport. These colleagues would not have 
thought twice about the wording a few years ago, but by slowly 
educating people we can start to influence what is / is not 
acceptable. Obviously we've got a long way to go in educating 
south africans!

So Patrick, your wording of the service to the public is 
fundamentally important and I hope you will keep the list informed 
of developments. If you asked me about why my loyalties lay, it 
would not be with special needs, but thats because of my own 
experience. Equally I'm not in favour of 'impaired' because I do not 
like the term 'learning impairment'. My sister, and my mother, both 
need 'special' considerations when using an airport and flying. I 
would like to use a service that meets their needs effectively and 
one that isn't just paying lip service. 

I can't conclude ...... ooer .... I would like to give more thought to 
the issue, and I would like to wait to hear what other people have to 
say.

Rita
 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager