this is the best answer so far to my query about knowledge management
classification terms.......thanks Margery
At 09:18 AM 2/17/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Fiona,
>This is a question that we (TFPL) have been asked a lot over the last year.
>We think the 'problem' is, that KM is so specific to each organisation, any
>taxonomy/thesaurus/call it what you will will always have to be very
>specific to the organisation.
>Which means that there is a lot going on within organisations and not a lot
>in the public domain. That said, it's worth looking at some of the headings
>used by MCB Press/Anbar (http://www.mcb.co.uk/ ).
>Best wishes
>Margery
>________________________________________________________________
>Margery Hyde, Head Professional Development
>e-mail: [log in to unmask] Web: http://www.tfpl.com
>TFPL Ltd.
>17-18 Britton St., London EC1M 5TL
>Tel: +44 (0) 20 7 251 5522 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7 490 4984
>
>In USA: TFPL Inc. 55 Broad Street, #20c, New York, NY10004
>Tel: +1 212 269 4666 Fax: +1 212 269 2777
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------------
>
>> Confidentiality Notice
>> This message may contain information and/or attachments private and
>> confidential to TFPL. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Any
>> information contained herein is not to be passed to any third party. If
>> you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of
>> this e-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is
>> unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please
>> inform the sender immediately.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------------------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|