JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-EDUC Archives


LIS-EDUC Archives

LIS-EDUC Archives


LIS-EDUC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-EDUC Home

LIS-EDUC Home

LIS-EDUC  2000

LIS-EDUC 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Seminar on Post-16 changes

From:

Judy Reading <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Judy Reading <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:25:41 +0000

Content-Type:

Text/Plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

Text/Plain (127 lines)

Dealing with post-16 changes <HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS> Overview and suggestions for further
reading


Dear Colleagues

This Sunday I finally finished sorting out copies of the papers and
notes from the seminar organised here on the 17th October on
"Dealing with Post-16 changes" to send out to a few people who
couldn't attend. It took me so long because I felt obliged to do a
little extra research. Several participants of the conference
suggested in their feedback that they would have liked more
specific information about the changes between the old A levels and
the new arrangements, suggestions about specific new resource and
more information about key skills and what implications this last
might have for the Library. I have done a little reading around and
talking with people and came up with the following additional
information. If anyone else would like to correct or add anything
or make any comments to the list I should be grateful.

If anyone would like copies of the papers and notes from the
original seminar please contact me - I should need a SAE.


Some characteristics of the new arrangements as they might affect
resources
1. There have been little fundamental changes in the A
level syllabuses - except that as there are now fewer boards - 3 now
- the publishers will be able to write textbooks for specific exam
syllabuses. Our history tutor here warned me against buying too
much too soon - she said publishers have a tendency to just change
the cover so it says "Suitable for the new syllabus" without really
changing the content. In time however this should make the link
between resources and courses easier.

2. Schools are trying to timetable a wider choice of subjects -
something Chris Talbot talked about as Head of Sixth Form Studies
during the seminar. The impact on the Library will be a need to
cater for a wider range of subjects some new to the school. It
might be appropriate to allow students to borrow more resources but
for shorter times. Short loan collections might help - and
collections of photocopied articles (within copyright of course).
Some librarians noted that there was a lack of resources in some of
these new areas eg health and social care, hospitality, catering and
tourism, psychology and sociology, especially at a suitable level
for school students rather than health professionals.

3. The new AS levels are not just half A levels - they do not expect
students to have reached the understanding usual at the end of a 2
year course - and they will require resources at an appropriate level.
In fact a high rate of drop-out with the old A level which might be
partly due to students experiencing difficulty could be reduced with
more students accumulating AS level credits. Librarians in
the discussion time described how they often spent time helping
students with material that was too difficult for them - and said
there was a lack of material at a suitable level.

4. From reading the key texts about the post-16 changes
(listed below) it seems there is nothing particularly new about
the ways resources are used in the new post-16 courses. It is still
up to the teacher to devise the best ways to use resources, the extent
to which new technology might be used and the extent to which
independent learning tasks are set. This makes it just as important
as ever that librarians in schools and colleges establish effective
working relationships with the teachers.

5. I did a search on the British Education Index to find journal
articles on resourcing the new curriculum and found nothing
specific. I think given time more information will emerge - recent
issues of Teaching history and Teaching geography have included
discussions about new appropriate resources. There has been a
lot of general discussion at a subject level about the changes - for
example - The English & media Magazine No. 41 Spring 2000 has an
article called "Changes at Alevel" and they refer to an earlier
article in Issue 36 of the same magazine.

The key texts for the post-16 changes are:
Review of Qualifications for 16-19 year olds : full report /
Ron Dearing - SCAA, 1996 1858381037 Ref COM/96/460 £5

Aiming higher : Labours plans for reform of the 14-19 curriculum
March 1996 - Labour Party

Learning to succeed : a new framework for post-16 learning /
DfEE - Stationery Office, June 1999 - 0101439229 Cm 4392 £9.70

Qualifying for Success : a consultation paper on the future of Post-16
Qualifications / DfEE, 1997 PP93/30586/1097/223
[Accompanied by questionnaire]

Qualifications 16-19 - QCA, 1999

Curriculum guidance for 2000 : implementing the changes to 16-19
qualifications / QCA - QCA,1999 - 1858383781 tel. 01787 884444 £5
QCA/99/424

Key skills

Several participants said they felt that more information about key
skills would have been useful during the seminar. It is possible to
trace the discussion on key skills through-out the above documents.

In "Curriculum guidance for 2000" pages p. 20-23 there is a useful
summary of how key skills qualifications are being introduced.
There is also a lot of information on the web - see QCA, DfEE and
FEDA sites
for example:
www.qca.org.uk/keyskills/
http://www.keyskillssupport.net/ [DfEE]
http://www.q2000.feda.ac.uk/html/overview.htm

Finally
Could the lis-educ list be used to share information about useful
resources? Could we volunteer to take different areas and collect
reviews from teachers? Publishers might be happy to provide review
copies for such a project - if there was sufficient interest perhaps
the LA could be approached for help.

I hope this is helpful and look forward to your comments

Judy Reading
Librarian
Department of Educational Studies Library
15 Norham Gardens
Oxford
OX2 6PY

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager