JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2000

POETRYETC 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Some remarks on publishing

From:

"Jon Corelis" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:08:17 PDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

   Poetry in the English speaking world is now part of the academic
humanities, and the publication of poems, like the publications of
academic humanists, do not have as their primary purpose the
communication of knowledge:  they instead primarily serve a
credentialling function.  A real poet is one who gets published, and
there is among publication venues a very clear hierarchy of prestige
determining exactly how real the poets who are accepted into those
venues are.  Although many people will deny that they believe this
is true -- "why I can name a lot of excellent poets who never
published anywhere important" -- the fact remains that everyone acts
as if it were true.  If you ask ten poets whether they would be
vastly more excited to have an interest shown in their work by a
poet who had been published twice by Bloodaxe than by one who had
been published twice by The Tunbridge Wells Welcomer, nine would
admit to preferring the former, and the tenth would lie.

   In other words the publication of poetry is, like everything else
to which our society assigns any value, a matter of power -- a
minor and marginal power in terms of society in general, but
power nevertheless.  The hierarchy of prestige in literary
publication is supported by a hierarchy of people who have a power
to validate poetry in direct proportion to the prestige of the
publication venues whose gates they guard.  The results of depending
on this method for the dissemination of poetry on the quality of the
verse of our age speak for themselves.

   We make take some encouragement in this gloomy situation by
reflecting that literary publication as we know it is historically a
late and unusual development.  Poetry in every culture with which I
am familiar began as utterance, a situation which for some reason
seems to be extremely favorable for poetry.  The next stage was for
writing to be used as a sort of aide-memoire to utterance.  The idea
that the writing is the poem -- that is, that a poem is what we
today call a text -- is generally characteristic of late and
decadent periods.  Plato, standing at the end of a great epoch whose
culture was founded on oral verse utterance, saw the problem
clearly:

       For this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of
       those who learn to use it, because they will not practice
       their memory.  Their trust in writing, produced by external
       characters which are no part of themselves, will discourage
       the use of their own memory within them.  You have invented
       an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your
       pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they
       will read many things without instruction and will therefore
       seem to know many things, when they are for the most part
       ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise,
       but only appear wise.

And he was right.  The German monk who wrote "grammata sola carent
fato" lived in the depths of an age in which, as in our own, poetry
had become the sterile academic exercise of a tiny elite and the
Muse had gone into a coma.

   I don't think our present situation has any technological
solution so long as those solutions are still a form of writing.
What's needed is to get back to the utterable source.  I'm not sure
how to do this.  I most certainly don't mean a society where poetry
is only transmitted in pub readings.  I don't know what a modern
poetry of utterance would look like, any more than I know what a
society not based on the domination of the powerful would look like.
Perhaps there may be some hope of something developing in Greece,
India, Russia, the Arab world, and other places where the detachment
of the art of poetry from both human society and the human voice has
not gone to the irreversible extreme which it has in our own
culture.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager