Now, what the heck is all this about?
Jim McNeill
Living Easton
----------
>From: [log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Conference update - Peter Claughton
>Date: Tue, Nov 28, 2000, 1:45 am
>
>Dear Peter,
>
>I am very sorry to speak my mind on this, but until the absolute principals
>of this mailbase are sorted out, I cannot see that this mailbase can partake
>in principled discussion. I refer to one particular instance, and until this
>matter is resolved publicly, this mailbase cannot take part through
>principled general public debate. Again, I take no part in the issue between
>these two parties, & I likewise take NO sides whatsoever, but, sorry, you MUST
> intervene as moderator in this issue. This has now become an international
>issue, and will not be resolved unless someone takes total hold over the
>issue. This is now in your hands whether you like it or not. You own this
>mailbase, and, as 'moderator' you are now obliged, to do so - I refrain from
>using the word law.
>
>Please forgive me all, but I am fed up with this issue that has been
>partially covered up, and the time has come that it must be resolved once an
>for all. If not, it will be resolved in other ways - a choice that none of us
>wish to follow, but if law is to become the issue well....... Hopefully
>not.........
>
>I am not involved between these two parties, and wish to keep it this way,
>but only the mailbase can resolve the problem. Everyone knows what I mean. I
>remain, as always will, neutral in this & similar matters. I hope someone,
>wisely advised, will seek a solution to this problem that ultimately sort
>this problem out for us all.
>
>Regards, Bernard.
>
|