---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:22:40 +0100 (BST)
From: Keith O'Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: periodic revalidation.
Dear Kate,
Like most members, I have been unable to attend council or AGMs because of
time constraints. The first I was aware of this to be honest was when Dr
McKee distributed the draft. I really think this ought to be put to the
vote rather than lumped in with many other proposals as part of a
strategy which goes through 'on the wing'. It is both profound in its
implications and contentious.
Thanks for your advice re: the other matters.
Regards,
Keith.
On Thu, 25 May 2000 [log in to unmask] wrote: [excerpt]
>
> The issue of periodic revalidation was in the two consultative documents
> (Our Professional Future) issued last year. They were both voted on by the
> councils of the two organisations, and the second version was voted on by
> both AGMs. The final implementing proposals will go to AGMs this year and
> next, so there is still time and opportunity for members to vote on them.
> In the meanwhile, discussions on lists will contribute to drawing up
> proposals for the new qualifications, as will comments sent in to Bob McKee
> on the corporate plan.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|