JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  2000

ENVIROETHICS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The Moral Equivalent of War, was Re: Truth of Global Warming

From:

Chris Lees <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 18 Apr 2000 20:08:52 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

>At 11:49 AM 4/18/00 +0100, you wrote:
>
>>BTW thanks for posting the David Crockett Williams input to Strategic Plan
>>2000. I found it very interesting, especially the move to try and convince us
>>that natural gas is somehow 'clean'...
>>
>
>Chris, I'm sorry to say that the section on natural gas was totally wrong:
>
>>in absolutely no way is natural
>>   gas combustion "cleaner" in terms of reducing carbon dioxide emissions
>>   because it still yields carbon dioxide upon combustion in the same
>>   proportions as coal or oil.
>
>In fact, any basic primer on CO2 will confirm that natural gas emits less
>CO2 per unit of energy generated than oil or coal. So in the UK in 1990,
>natural gas contibuted 33% of the enrgy supply, but only 19% of the CO2
>emissions. I'm afraid that the writer's failure to grasp this basic point
>doesn't fill me with confidence about the accuracy of the rest of the post.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Chris

Well, with due respect to your expertise...haven't you missed the point ?

I am, of course, very well aware that NG is  _cleanER_ than coal and oil,
and that the UKs reduction in CO2 emissons is largely due to the switch from
coal to NG... that's not the point that the guy was trying to get at, and that
I'm trying to explain to you here now...the point rests on the 
definition of the
words CLEAN. As you just said above, 33 percent NG gives 19 percent of
emissions. How can you say that 19 percent is CLEAN ? It ain't. It is still
a large contribution to atmospheric CO2, out from the Earth's crust where
it was locked away, and into the atmosphere where it adds to Warming.

To my mind, a CLEAN fuel, if the word is to make sense in this context,
is a fuel which does not contribute pollution of the environment.
Natural Gas does contribute to pollution of the environment - just
rather less than coal and oil - so Natural Gas is not CLEAN, just CLEANER.

It seems that the fossil fuel lobby wants to convince us that NG is clean,
therefore everything is okay. That's obviously not correct, because NG
still adds to atmospheric carbon.

As I read him, that's what the guy meant.

C.L.




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager