Before I start I confess to knowing very little about this issue, and am a
sceptic to both sides. I'm not leaping to any conclusions. I do however
have a friend who is something of a meteorological nut (gets all the Met
Service weather records over years, collects his own etc. - weird I know).
He is convinced that much of the climate change observed relates to sun spot
activity (every 22 years or so - and very regular if you look at the data),
and maintains that there are many in the met community who feel the same.
An interesting theory.
Chris P
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion forum for environmental ethics.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of John Foster
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 December 2000 20:35
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Models of global warming
>
>
> Steve:
> >Given the lack of actual data and the reliance on considerable amounts of
> >proxy data the models that predict out for over 100 years should be taken
> >not only with a grain of salt, but a canister.
>
> Ostrich talk. You mean a 45 gallon barrel of sand. Now you are
> complaining
> about 'proxy' data when you were just using it yourself. Remember - wink,
> nudge, say no more- know what I mean, know what I mean - solar irradience
> for 'outside the atmosphere' from 1900.
>
> Too bloody hilarious.....Ha ha ahahahahahahah Ha
>
> Too funny.
>
> >
>
|