>> I have performed a correlation of the temperatures measured between 1932
>> and
>> 2000 to see if there is a linear trend of 'warming' at Churchill,
>> Manitoba.
>
>ROFLMFAO!
>
>Look after John excoriates me for using a linear model with multiple
>variables, John uses the most brain dead simple model possible, the linear
>trend model. A model that is so patently unreal that it isn't taken very
>seriuously except for short term forcasting in limited instances and to
>provide comparisons to more sophisticated models. LMAO. Hooo, hooo it is
>too funny.
How else are we to prove that your assertion was wrong again...
No you are too funny. You commented in an earlier post that the temperature
in Hudson Bay was getting cooler. I took all the temperatures recorded for
the months of January and February from 1932 until 2000 to see if it was
getting warmer. It has been getting warmer. I did not use linear regression,
but rather made a test of correlation concerning the observed temperatures
and month of year. The scatter plot shows that it is warming [Pearson
Products method]. There was no attempt to make any inferences as to cause
using the test of correlation. However I did provide a 'casual' explanation
as to why the temperatures have risen since 1932. The correlation proves
'Arctic warming' is occurring...
Now I will ask you to demonstrate or prove that temperature in Churchill is
getting cooler....but you cannot.
john foster
|