JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  2000

ENVIROETHICS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [Ethics of immunocontraception?]

From:

VeggieBiggs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 2 Feb 00 08:04:50 EST

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

Like all moral decisions, most are not so cut and dry, as one decision does
only harm and another does only good.  Soon, we human beings will have to
sacrifice some reproductive freedom ourselves.  Not just about abortion, but
number of children per couple. China, (that horrible evil country), has had to
face these decisions sooner than the West, as their society was thousands of
years old, when Europeans were just beginning to annihilate the Native
American human and non-human population.
Predictions are for the population in the U.S. to approach 500 million midway
through the 21st century.  If deer lacked habitat before, it will most all be
occupied by humans then.  Of course, another pseudo-deer population explosion
will be invented, and the philanthropic hunters will offer their services to
the rest of us.  I venture to say that most humans, and deer alike would
rather render some degree of choice in how many dozen offspring we create, in
order to preclude a situation where we would be killed because there are too
many of "our kind".  Painful, inconvenient, frightening might any form of
contraception be, but certainly better than a bullet in the head or an arrow
embedded in the abdomen.  Just as human contraception used to be fraught with
many side effects, with time and willingness to work through the problems, it
would be become less traumatic for deer populations, (and hopefully other
animals that are brutally killed in the most barbaric traps).  I have had
similar reservations,(about immunocontraception), but still feel it would save
them much more suffering than hunting them to control their numbers.  Just as
some people predict that human population may plataeu at some pleasant level,
there have been studies that show that as food supply gradually decreases that
fertility will decline comparably, without any starvation, (of course some
pretty scrawny deer).   That said, I believe we should try to develop oral
contraception for deer, that could be put in feed at feeding stations, that
would only be used when population density reached a critical number.  The
biggest obstacle is,(ironically!), that hunters themselves, have opposed oral
contraception, since the deer would not be marked, and then heaven forbid they
might get "some hormones" in the victim that they slay.

Peace for All Beings
Jamey Lee West



JOSH WINCHELL <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I am curious if discussions regarding the ethics of immunocontraception for
wildlife management has occurred at some point on this list?  If so, where
in the archives could this thread be found? If not, I would be very
interested in moving such a thread along.

There has already been a good deal of discussion between hunters and
anti-hunters about the RELATIVE merits and drawbacks of immunocontraception
and sport hunting as management tools. However, discussion about the ethics
of  wildlife birth-control is very hard to find.

It seems such a discussion might focus on a few areas.

Practical matters:
- PZP, the most promising wildlife immunocontraceptive, is made from pig
ovaries. These ovaries are not obtained solely from those pigs who decided
to pursue family/litter planning.
- Live-trapping wild animals to hand-inject contraceptive is stressful to
the animal and can lead to stress-related mortality in some cases. 

Wildlife rights:
- From an A-R perspective, how are wildlife reproductive rights handled? Do
such rights even exist?
- What about pursuit of happiness? (In reference to those deer and feral
horses & burros who are American citizens)
- Any different from a animal welfare perspective?
Cleveland Amory apparently wasn't too concerned about rights issues when he
stated, "Prey will be separated from predator, and there will be no
overpopulation or starvation because all will be controlled by sterilization
or implant."

Other angles: 
In general, where do enviro-ethics thinkers (that's means you) fall out on
the use of biotechnology for long-term management of wildlife populations?
What does this say about our relationship with the natural world?


Looking forward to hearing to hearing your thoughts.


-Joshua






____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager