I am sorry I meant to post this, that other article is rather controversial
in opinion. And I was discussing with someone else at the same time. All=20
apologies.
Li-
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
Meeting ends without agreement =E2=80=93 formal Plenary decides to suspend=20=
COP-6,=20
reconvene in 2001=20
The formal Plenary session of the meeting in The Hague has concluded with a=20
decision by Parties to suspend COP-6 and reconvene in 2001.=20
Having been unable to reach agreement on some of the key outstanding issues,=
=20
Parties concluded their formal meeting shortly after 6:00 pm by adopting=20
adecision to reconvene for COP-6 Part II in 2001. The decision requests COP-=
6=20
President Pronk to seek advice on the desirability of resuming in May/June=20
2001 with the aim of completing work on negotiating texts and adopting a=20
comprehensive and balanced package of decisions on all issues under the=20
Buenos Aires Plan of Action. It also requests President Pronk to make=20
proposals for the further development and consideration of texts and seek=20
advice before the resumed meeting takes place. Finally, it urges Parties to=20
intensify political consultations among themselves.
<A HREF=3D"http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop6/index.html">ENB @ UNFCCC COP-6 (T=
he=20
Hague, November 2000)</A>=20
|