Recently some arguments have been again tried to be refuted not on their
essance, but in terms of logic. Although nothing wrong with this, I think
this is not valid in this case. You cannot borrow 'law' logic to address
ethical issues: (colon Jim)
TO my mind, once guilty and red-handed, always guilty and red-handed.
Perhaps this has numerous exceptions, but i understand that
BURSON MARSTELLAR HAS NOT DONE PR WORK TO RAISE ITS OWN ETHICAL IMAGE
after being caught red-handed.
Unless this is the job of Jim and Steve!
(my turn for sarcasm now!).
Maria-Stella
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|