Hi keston,
does it matter whether anybody 'here' agrees with you?
I'm in the thick of hayfeverish splutter and am having
trouble trying to work out what phrases such as 'heaving
language upon life' might mean - although i like the sound
of it alright. So, before agreeing with you I'm having trouble
trying to understand you. The trouble that i have with ideas
about the 'totality of relations' is the burden of a kind of
panoptical implication that seems utterly reprehensible to
me as it convoys (yes i mean that) authority and front loads
'meaning' into a system that Hayles identifies as a fading
binary of presence / absence. I need to hear more from you
on all such shadows too before any agreement can (and it might)
be struck.
love and love
cris
--
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|