Gareth Haulfryn Williams suggested
> Now then, following on from that, do we need an independent Newsletter?
> Could we not share MJ with our museum colleagues? Would they welcome an
> archives section? Would they like 1500 + additional names on their
> circulation list? Does their advertising mean that MJ is in effect free?
> If
> it does, does that mean that SoA could save money by not producing a
> separate monthly newsletter? But would this identify us as 'objects'
> people
> rather than 'info' people? Would it upset relations with the LA...or what
> about sharing their Record instead?
>
if we are being radical, why not have a SoA presence in various different
places, for example Museums Journal, Library Association Records, Records
Management Newsletter, and a conservation counterpart? The virtual - or
dispersed - SoA Newsletter?
Susan Healy
PRO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|