JISCMail - COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

June 2017

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:47:36 +0900	388 lines
Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008	Vipul Parekh	Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:56:51 -0400	76 lines
Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008	Van Snyder	Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:38:05 -0700	90 lines
Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:12:35 +0900	180 lines
Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:32:41 +0900	37 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:22:05 +1000	23 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:55:09 +0900	41 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:40:03 +1000	37 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:51:42 +1000	52 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Malcolm Cohen	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:30:08 +0900	37 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:43:27 +1000	60 lines
Re: A question on the feature 'recursive components of allocatable type' from Fortran 2008	Vipul Parekh	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:32:03 -0400	32 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Bill Long	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:48:30 +0000	68 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:15:41 +1000	54 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Van Snyder	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:51:01 -0700	33 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Bill Long	Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:25:16 +0000	60 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	John Harper	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:06:47 +1200	53 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	John Harper	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:12:22 +1200	73 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:00:16 +0900	70 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	W. J. Metzger	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:41:30 +0200	91 lines
Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:12:00 +0900	146 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Vipul Parekh	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:09:55 -0400	96 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Bill Long	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:10:38 +0000	88 lines
A question on CMPLX function	Vipul Parekh	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:32:02 -0400	79 lines
Re: A question on CMPLX function	Anton Shterenlikht	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:14:07 +0100	83 lines
Re: A question on CMPLX function	Vipul Parekh	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:26:16 -0400	42 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Phillip Helbig	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:10:55 +0200	17 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	David Vowles	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:04:12 +0000	46 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Dick Hendrickson	Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:06:40 -0500	258 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Phillip Helbig	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:33:37 +0200	21 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	W. J. Metzger	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:02:32 +0200	162 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101)	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:40:12 +0000	138 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Bill Long	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:40:20 +0000	32 lines
On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type	Vipul Parekh	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:50:45 -0400	119 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	John Harper	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:46:45 +1200	75 lines
Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type	Dick Hendrickson	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:21:31 -0500	312 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:07:00 +1000	85 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:08:49 +1000	24 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:21:37 +1000	52 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:23:37 +1000	29 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Van Snyder	Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:25:28 -0700	41 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:32:03 +1000	41 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:37:19 +1000	34 lines
Re: A question on CMPLX function	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:42:00 +1000	50 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:45:33 +1000	32 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:51:17 +1000	63 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:52:49 +1000	35 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:57:13 +1000	56 lines
Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type	Vipul Parekh	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 00:07:11 -0400	92 lines
Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:22:17 +0900	49 lines
Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:35:26 +0900	31 lines
Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:04:20 +1000	67 lines
Re: +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- +AFs-COMP-FORTRAN-90+AF0- Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Malcolm Cohen	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 14:40:34 +0900	40 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:30:56 +1000	59 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:07:14 +0200	17 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:18:01 +1000	32 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Dan Nagle	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:45:01 -0600	53 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Bill Long	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:14:36 +0000	41 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:58:35 +0200	26 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Steve Lionel	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:15:29 -0400	61 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Phillip Helbig	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:18:22 +0200	32 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Steve Lionel	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:42:22 -0400	84 lines
Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type	Vipul Parekh	Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:27:06 -0400	53 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Ian Chivers	Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:14:09 +0100	187 lines
Re: On the matter of an alternate constructor for a COMPLEX type	Anton Shterenlikht	Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:02:48 +0100	20 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Phillip Helbig	Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:36:26 +0200	28 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Vipul Parekh	Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:14:24 -0400	42 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Van Snyder	Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:31:00 -0700	39 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Steve Lionel	Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:47:52 -0400	31 lines
DTIO question	Walt Brainerd	Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:19:23 -0600	144 lines
Re: DTIO question	Steve Lionel	Sat, 10 Jun 2017 17:24:45 -0400	89 lines
Re: DTIO question	Bill Long	Sat, 10 Jun 2017 21:47:33 +0000	110 lines
Re: DTIO question	Malcolm Cohen	Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:38:24 +0900	486 lines
Re: DTIO question	Daniel C Chen	Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:21:39 -0400	200 lines
Re: DTIO question	Walt Brainerd	Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:30:21 -0600	397 lines
LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Vipul Parekh	Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:13:30 -0400	115 lines
Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Malcolm Cohen	Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:34:07 +0900	147 lines
Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Vipul Parekh	Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:21:04 -0400	45 lines
Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Malcolm Cohen	Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:59:17 +0900	77 lines
Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Robin Vowels	Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:56:20 +1000	130 lines
Re: Features for the next Fortran Standard (following Fortran 2015)	Robin Vowels	Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:47:17 +1000	58 lines
Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Vipul Parekh	Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:32:21 -0400	24 lines
Re: LITERAL_KINDS, a statement that can help enhance working with literal constants in Fortran?	Robin Vowels	Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:56:17 +1000	38 lines
elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments	Anton Shterenlikht	Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:47 +0100	40 lines
Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments	John Reid	Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:57:17 +0100	56 lines
Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments	Anton Shterenlikht	Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:13:21 +0100	41 lines
Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments	John Reid	Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:43:57 +0100	58 lines
Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments	Anton Shterenlikht	Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:06:23 +0100	27 lines
Re: elements of array coarray var defined/referenced in unordered segments	Bill Long	Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:04:13 +0000	95 lines

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

June 2017

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives