JISCMail - LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS Archives

January 2017

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Study of bibliometric competencies	Andrew M Cox	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:08:19 +0000	57 lines
Metrics in the next REF	Katie Evans	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:01:49 +0000	161 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Katie Evans	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:45:41 +0000	220 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Elizabeth Gadd	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:27:43 +0000	435 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Rowlands, Ian	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:54:27 +0000	555 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Elizabeth Gadd	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:10:01 +0000	597 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	CHARLES OPPENHEIM	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:47:38 +0000	744 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Alan Dix	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 20:33:22 +0000	882 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	CHARLES OPPENHEIM	Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:54:39 +0000	738 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Elizabeth Gadd	Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:47:19 +0000	975 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Simon Kerridge	Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:54:58 +0000	1038 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Anne-Wil Harzing	Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:21:00 +0000	4127 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Alan Dix	Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:55:31 +0000	3463 lines
Re: {Disarmed} Re: Metrics in the next REF	Whitton M.J.	Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:48:47 +0000	2039 lines
CILIP Conference - Call for Papers	Rachel Kudlick	Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:01:32 +0000	153 lines
Altmetrics for books: tracking engagement and driving discovery	Catherine Williams	Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:48:33 +0000	40 lines
Re: Study of bibliometric competencies	Andrew M Cox	Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:49:00 +0000	142 lines
2 Researcher positions available at the German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW), Berlin	Stahlschmidt, Stephan	Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:01:18 +0000	70 lines
Re: Study of bibliometric competencies	Clara Ginther	Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:11:14 +0100	312 lines
Re: Study of bibliometric competencies	Andrew M Cox	Thu, 12 Jan 2017 07:30:47 +0000	2131 lines
Re: Study of bibliometric competencies	Clara Ginther	Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:52:19 +0100	504 lines
Practical guidance for any librarian learning to deal with data	James Williams	Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:40:34 +0000	50 lines
Article: Can You Measure the Impact of Books?	Alison McNab	Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:03:02 +0000	213 lines
Re: LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS Digest - 5 Jan 2017 (#2017-4)	Vicky Wallace	Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:03:10 +0000	479 lines
Responsible metrics webinar from Leicester University	Elizabeth Gadd	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:57:11 +0000	136 lines
session	Tracy Banton	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:40:09 +0000	54 lines
Canceled: session	Tracy Banton	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:11:22 +0000	94 lines
Re: LIS-BIBLIOMETRICS Digest - 5 Jan 2017 (#2017-4)	Elizabeth Gadd	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:13:34 +0000	504 lines
Re: session	Mary Pickstone	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:51:04 +0000	263 lines
Re: session	Tracy Banton	Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:24:14 +0000	361 lines
Bibliometrics in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences event - Friday 24th March	Andrew Gray	Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:04:59 +0000	298 lines
Retraction: Bibliometrics in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences event - Friday 24th March	Elizabeth Gadd	Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:34:18 +0000	68 lines
Re: Bibliometrics in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences event - Friday 24th March	Anne-Wil Harzing	Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:55:41 +0000	1260 lines
Recall message: don't send messages when you are just awake either!!	Anne-Wil Harzing	Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:56:26 +0000	1999 lines
Loughborough University's Statement on Responsible use of Metrics now available	Elizabeth Gadd	Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:29:11 +0000	127 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Katie Evans	Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:09:06 +0000	353 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Kent, Ray	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:26:10 +0000	100 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Simon Kerridge	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:18:37 +0000	110 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Alan Dix	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:39:16 +0000	375 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Katie Fraser	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:04:25 +0000	552 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Simon Kerridge	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:17:22 +0000	475 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Simon Kerridge	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:34:21 +0000	655 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Nicola Meenan	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:44:55 +0000	806 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Simon Kerridge	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:46:42 +0000	704 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Alan Dix	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:20:47 +0000	775 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Anna Clements	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:31:17 +0000	862 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Elizabeth Gadd	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:52:29 +0000	882 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Alan Dix	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:58:28 +0000	708 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Simon Kerridge	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:46:21 +0000	703 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Kirstyn Radford	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:46:27 -0000	1012 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Kent, Ray	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:52:51 +0000	143 lines
Re: Use of metrics in the REF - further thoughts	Jennifer Evans	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:20:28 +0000	190 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Katie Fraser	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:46:02 +0000	975 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Anne-Wil Harzing	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:47:17 +0000	2610 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Grace, Stephen 5	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:02:02 +0000	1751 lines
Re: Study of bibliometric competencies	Andrew M Cox	Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:58:46 +0000	230 lines
Study of bibliometric competencies	Elizabeth Gadd	Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:12:50 +0000	237 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Elizabeth Gadd	Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:20:26 +0000	1747 lines
Re: Metrics in the next REF	Anne-Wil Harzing	Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:09:12 +0000	3569 lines