JISCMail - CCP4BB Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

CCP4BB Archives

April 2012

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Tom Peat	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:56:42 +1000	67 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kevin Jin	Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:05:45 -0700	81 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bosch, Juergen	Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:28:23 -0400	201 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:05:45 -0700	279 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:34:19 -0700	21 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Anastassis Perrakis	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:08:42 +0100	28 lines
one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Paul Emsley	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:05:10 +0100	29 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Gerard Bricogne	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:18:15 +0100	68 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Robbie Joosten	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:21:31 +0200	161 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	George T. DeTitta	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:52:13 +0000	54 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Adrian Goldman	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:01:29 +0300	101 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Paul Emsley	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:09:13 +0100	110 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Patrick Loll	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:23:40 -0400	85 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:28:52 +0200	52 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Antony Oliver	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:33:57 +0000	175 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:48:08 +0200	17 lines
Re: one datum many data?	Robert Blessing	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:51:51 -0400	82 lines
Re: one datum many data?	VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:11:24 +0200	52 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	David Schuller	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:18:15 -0400	29 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Gerard Bricogne	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:35:11 +0100	44 lines
	protein chemistry	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 00:12:16 +0530	35 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Phoebe Rice	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:03:16 -0500	73 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bryan Lepore	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:05:04 -0400	53 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kevin Jin	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:05:39 -0700	202 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Bosch, Juergen	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:12:36 -0400	72 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:14:48 -0700	98 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Klaus Fütterer	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:20:02 +0100	128 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kendall Nettles	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:27:33 -0400	185 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	David Briggs	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:31:22 +0100	163 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:40:21 -0700	434 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Ethan Merritt	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:42:02 -0700	25 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bosch, Juergen	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:57:33 -0400	95 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Philippe DUMAS	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 00:29:38 +0200	24 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 01:57:41 +0200	210 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Artem Evdokimov	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 23:45:47 -0500	69 lines
	Marcus Fislage	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:34:07 +0200	103 lines
	Mark J van Raaij	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:44:44 +0200	55 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Manfred S. Weiss	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:47:26 +0200	103 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Antony Oliver	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:13:32 +0000	134 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	John R Helliwell	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:29:31 +0100	160 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Gerard Bricogne	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:39:18 +0100	145 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	jens Preben Morth	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:59:09 +0200	50 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	<>	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:26:49 +0200	402 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Boaz Shaanan	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:33:25 +0000	90 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	David Schuller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:56:06 -0400	24 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	<>	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 15:03:44 +0200	38 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:03:42 +0200	131 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Robert Sweet	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:04:52 -0400	52 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:15:17 -0700	36 lines
Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Jacob Keller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:15:23 -0500	89 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	David Schuller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:20:33 -0400	84 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Francis E Reyes	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:24:52 -0600	40 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Andreas Förster	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:28:41 +0100	39 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	James Kiefer	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:39:41 -0700	98 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:41:02 -0700	360 lines
Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biophysics and Protein Engineering in Rockville, Maryland, USA	Scott Walsh	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:45:52 +0100	24 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Jacob Keller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:52:46 -0500	240 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Gerard Bricogne	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:25:06 +0100	139 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:25:21 +0200	65 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	George T. DeTitta	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:27:41 +0000	92 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Jacob Keller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:30:26 -0500	320 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Phoebe Rice	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:43:42 -0500	114 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Pavel Afonine	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:52:34 -0700	229 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Jacob Keller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:24:55 -0500	181 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Prince, D Bryan	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:32:32 -0400	322 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Bosch, Juergen	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:38:59 -0400	347 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Kendall Nettles	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:46:20 -0400	372 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Jacob Keller	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:52:30 -0500	521 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Tim Gruene	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:53:08 +0200	95 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Maria Sola i Vilarrubias	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:00:48 +0200	337 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	aaleshin	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:09:10 -0700	119 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Nat Echols	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:28:25 -0700	33 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Pete Meyer	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:45:44 -0500	79 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Phoebe Rice	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:01:39 -0500	131 lines
Re: one datum many data? [was Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication]	Andreas Förster	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:16:32 +0100	41 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Randy Read	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:16:47 +0100	257 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Lynn F. Ten Eyck	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:25:41 -0700	296 lines
Re: Requested: Three-Day Data Fabrication Workshop	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:35:47 -0700	581 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Ravi Nookala	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:30:34 +0100	450 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	<>	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:34:56 +0200	508 lines
Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis	Toby Longwood	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:49:50 +0200	74 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Dyda	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:10:31 -0400	47 lines
ccp4i project display	wtempel	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:52:14 -0400	36 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	James Whisstock	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:11:32 +1000	291 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bosch, Juergen	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:45:25 -0400	109 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Mark J van Raaij	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:58:51 +0200	79 lines
zinc fingre	Rajesh kumar	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:07:01 -0500	67 lines
Re: zinc fingre	Debasish Chattopadhyay	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:17:34 +0000	206 lines
Re: zinc fingre	Rajesh kumar	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:20:10 -0500	252 lines
Re: zinc finger	James Kiefer	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:42:28 -0700	36 lines
Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis	Florian Schmitzberger	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:06:38 -0400	257 lines
Re: an ambiguous result of molecular replacement	Eleanor Dodson	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:34:58 +0100	72 lines
Re: zinc fingre	Pius Padayatti	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:51:00 -0400	53 lines
Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis	Debasish Chattopadhyay	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:58:59 +0000	332 lines
2nd Annual CLS Mx Data Collection School	Shaun Labiuk	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:09:43 +0100	25 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Maria Sola i Vilarrubias	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:13:40 +0200	268 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Mark J van Raaij	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:21:53 +0200	154 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Mark J van Raaij	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:28:55 +0200	154 lines
Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis	Enrico Stura	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:40:38 +0200	67 lines
Re: simple solution to - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:44:50 -0700	363 lines
Re: zinc fingre	Debasish Chattopadhyay	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:47:16 +0000	65 lines
Re: simple solution to - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:15:16 -0700	377 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Herbert J. Bernstein	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:33:47 -0400	186 lines
Re: Substitution to glycerol during crystallogenesis	Edward A. Berry	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:39:41 -0400	102 lines
Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Roger Rowlett	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:57:40 -0400	38 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Tom Peat	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:07:53 +1000	63 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Tom Peat	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:17:45 +1000	208 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Ed Pozharski	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:19:05 -0400	55 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bryan Lepore	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:19:36 -0400	44 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:30:19 -0700	67 lines
core rmsd in coot	Ursula Schulze-Gahmen	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:51:48 -0700	33 lines
Trueblood Award Nominations	Paul Adams	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:01:15 -0700	65 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	David Schuller	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:01:30 -0400	58 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Dale Tronrud	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:16:55 -0700	67 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Kip Guja	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:17:26 -0400	77 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Harry Powell	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:26:54 +0100	155 lines
Application deadline approaching: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA	Sanishvili, Ruslan	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:14:35 -0500	226 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kevin Jin	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:33:36 -0700	34 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	James Stroud	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:14 -0600	49 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bryan Lepore	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:31:42 -0400	58 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Ho Leung Ng	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:33:45 -1000	57 lines
Re: zinc fingre	Peter Hsu	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:43:48 +0100	20 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:11:50 -0700	163 lines
Re: ccp4i project display	Zhijie Li	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:20:54 -0400	92 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kevin Jin	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:22:33 -0700	143 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bosch, Juergen	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:28:04 -0400	173 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Katherine Sippel	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:19:57 -0500	207 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kendall Nettles	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:21:44 -0400	131 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Zhijie Li	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:22:38 -0400	92 lines
modelling a flexible peptide	intekhab alam	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:37:05 +0900	57 lines
Re: modelling a flexible peptide	Zhijie Li	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:59:19 -0400	134 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	James Stroud	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:00:51 -0600	66 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Kendall Nettles	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:32:28 -0400	81 lines
Re: modelling a flexible peptide	Bosch, Juergen	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:24:15 -0400	124 lines
Re: very uninformative	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:07:20 -0700	307 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Tim Gruene	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:43:26 +0200	91 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Tom Peat	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:53:52 +1000	109 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Tim Gruene	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:09:26 +0200	116 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Takanori Nakane	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:21:17 +0900	24 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Roger Rowlett	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:06:46 -0400	287 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Roger Rowlett	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:13:19 -0400	319 lines
Re: zinc fingre	Rajesh kumar	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:16:14 -0500	87 lines
ccp4i project display	wtempel	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:21:02 -0400	31 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Frank von Delft	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:21:40 +0100	152 lines
Re: core rmsd in coot	Paul Emsley	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:53:04 +0100	36 lines
negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Chris Meier	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:16:17 +0200	52 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Ian Tickle	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:27:37 +0100	47 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Ian Tickle	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:29:35 +0100	33 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Roger Rowlett	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:31:50 -0400	54 lines
Re: very uninformative	Kevin Jin	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:40:53 -0700	275 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Jacob Keller	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:41:47 -0500	49 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Scott Classen	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:42:11 -0700	45 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Ian Tickle	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:55:02 +0100	33 lines
Re: core rmsd in coot	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:31:56 +0100	52 lines
Re: core rmsd in coot	Ed Pozharski	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:39:40 -0400	27 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:41:40 +0200	117 lines
PEG MME 2000 in powder form?	VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:01:24 +0200	61 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Garib N Murshudov	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:13:07 +0100	158 lines
Re: PEG MME 2000 in powder form?	VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:19:00 +0200	126 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Yuri Pompeu	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:25:14 +0100	14 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Katherine Sippel	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:32:08 -0500	143 lines
Cell dimensions	Uma Ratu	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:38:58 -0400	43 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Sanishvili, Ruslan	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:00:00 -0500	354 lines
problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Deepthi	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:07:58 -0700	42 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Eric Bennett	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:45:44 -0400	100 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:24:53 -0700	172 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Zhijie Li	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:59:59 -0400	236 lines
arp_waters still available?	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:23:27 -0700	32 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Frank von Delft	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 05:12:30 +0100	65 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	David Aragao	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:30:45 +1000	184 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Tim Gruene	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:48:59 +0200	67 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Harry Powell	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:05:19 +0100	127 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Clemens Vonrhein	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:17:27 +0100	54 lines
Re: arp_waters still available?	Victor Lamzin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:06:52 +0200	49 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	John R Helliwell	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:16:20 +0100	149 lines
CCP-EM positions now available	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:57:53 +0200	45 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Herbert J. Bernstein	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:50:59 -0400	181 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Roger Rowlett	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:08:40 -0400	343 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bosch, Juergen	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:02:37 -0400	389 lines
Category 4 Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Jrh	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:43:05 +0100	207 lines
Via Annual Reports...Re: [ccp4bb] very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Jrh	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:47:26 +0100	379 lines
mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Francis E Reyes	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:25:05 -0600	25 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Pete Meyer	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:54:26 -0500	31 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Ethan Merritt	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:00:29 -0700	26 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Miller, Mitchell D.	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:13:21 -0700	44 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Phil Jeffrey	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:30:25 -0400	37 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Deepthi	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:31:00 -0700	147 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Matthew Franklin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:07:16 -0400	250 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Ethan Merritt	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:21:27 -0700	67 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Oliver Smart	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:48:16 +0100	44 lines
PDF position Structural Cell Biology - Michigan	Amir Khan	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 19:24:54 +0100	126 lines
Re: mtz2cif capable of handling map coefficients	Ethan Merritt	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:37:47 -0700	73 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:15:08 -0700	298 lines
postdoctoral position at the NIH focused on understanding the mechanism of cytoskeletal regulators	ANTONINA ROLL-MECAK	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:31:14 -0400	317 lines
MOSFLM- Image compatibility	Yuri Pompeu	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:38:56 +0100	14 lines
Position in Structural Biology of Signaling	Qiang Chen	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:40:11 -0400	42 lines
Re: MOSFLM- Image compatibility	Yuri Pompeu	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:49:00 +0100	14 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:00:09 -0700	476 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Ronald E Stenkamp	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:03:31 -0700	210 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:11:27 -0700	274 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:30:06 -0700	306 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 19:58:07 -0700	54 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:46:43 -0700	63 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bosch, Juergen	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 23:57:11 -0400	59 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 21:13:15 -0700	115 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	John R Helliwell	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:05:17 +0100	228 lines
Re: negative difference density around sulphur and oxygen atoms	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:37:14 +0100	43 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:51:50 +0100	39 lines
Re: problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:25:11 +0100	109 lines
off topic: the effects of spontaneous oligomerization on crystallization	杨贝	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:41:12 -0400	77 lines
Re: off topic: the effects of spontaneous oligomerization on crystallization	Bosch, Juergen	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:49:50 -0400	91 lines
Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic	Melanie Adams-Cioaba	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:57:05 -0400	404 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Ronald E Stenkamp	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:23:17 -0700	263 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Patrick Loll	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:16:17 -0400	61 lines
UPDATED: Position Available: Technical Key Account Manager at Microlytic	Melanie Adams-Cioaba	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:41:50 -0400	412 lines
Error in Scala	Yuri Pompeu	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:29:53 +0100	25 lines
Re: Error in Scala	Antony Oliver	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:35:01 +0000	35 lines
Positions in Structural Biology of Signaling and HIV-related Immunology	Qiang Chen	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:17:06 -0400	44 lines
Re: Error in Scala	Phil Evans	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:17:14 +0100	35 lines
scala - handling of anomalous data	Matthew Chu	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:41:18 -0700	49 lines
Re: scala - handling of anomalous data	Phil Evans	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:55:57 +0100	41 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	James Whisstock	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 07:02:34 +1000	69 lines
Crystal handling	Theresa Hsu	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:24:06 +0100	19 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Jrh	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 09:17:31 +0100	292 lines
Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:42:47 -0700	44 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Roger Rowlett	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 12:50:20 -0400	130 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Nat Echols	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:52:39 -0700	38 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Eric Bennett	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:26:36 -0400	64 lines
A little perspective (Re: Trends in Data Fabrication)	Dima Klenchin	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:31:04 -0500	27 lines
Re: A little perspective (Re: Trends in Data Fabrication)	Bosch, Juergen	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 18:53:55 -0400	53 lines
Re: Crystal handling	Ho Leung Ng	Sat, 7 Apr 2012 13:15:38 -1000	35 lines
Re: Crystal handling (Summary)	Theresa Hsu	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 02:13:35 +0100	16 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Nicholas M Glykos	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:16:48 +0300	29 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Nicholas M Glykos	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:34:48 +0300	32 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Ian Tickle	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:53:22 +0100	53 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Harry Powell	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:15:04 +0100	204 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Nikolaos Glykos	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:59:22 +0300	31 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Ben Eisenbraun	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:09:06 -0400	34 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Ian Tickle	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:10:40 +0100	28 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Nikolaos Glykos	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:50:51 +0300	51 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	James Holton	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:48:16 -0700	189 lines
[OT] to CCP admin - CCP14 - who's in charge?	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:48:21 -0700	29 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:18:05 -0700	309 lines
Re: [OT] to CCP admin - CCP14 - who's in charge?	Harry	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 22:06:24 +0100	48 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:30:45 -0700	21 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Phil Evans	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:51:02 +0100	47 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:47:15 -0700	60 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Boaz Shaanan	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:32:47 +0000	87 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Phil Evans	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:38:05 +0100	101 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	David Schuller	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:46:36 -0400	40 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:55:06 -0700	60 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Richard Gillilan	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:01:45 +0000	38 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Pavel Afonine	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:02:33 -0700	56 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	aaleshin	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:11:30 -0700	57 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Pavel Afonine	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:24:43 -0700	109 lines
Re: very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication	Felix Frolow	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 21:29:21 +0300	157 lines
Instruct-NL Workshop on Wednesday April 25, 2012, in Leiden, the Netherlands	Raimond Ravelli	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:58:45 +0100	58 lines
Re: Refmac executables - win vs linux in RHEL VM	Marcin Wojdyr	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:57:07 +0100	43 lines
Disorder or poor phases?	Francis E Reyes	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:22:29 -0600	36 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Tim Gruene	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:38:39 +0200	72 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Dale Tronrud	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:00:28 -0700	95 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Francis E Reyes	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:04:29 -0600	51 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Gerard Bricogne	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:45:06 +0100	114 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Dale Tronrud	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:19:05 -0700	133 lines
	Abd Ghani Abd Aziz	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:24:10 +0100	12 lines
	Abd Ghani Abd Aziz	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:24:11 +0100	11 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Kay Diederichs	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:44:57 +0100	24 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Dale Tronrud	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:19:12 -0700	31 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Jens Kaiser	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:39:22 -0700	58 lines
Deadline april 16th: 24/25 May 2012 IGBMC symposium on “Future Challenges in Integrative Structural Biology”	Bruno KLAHOLZ	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:53:37 +0000	525 lines
Ligand fitting into density	Dipankar Manna	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:00 +0000	109 lines
Re: Ligand fitting into density	<>	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:38:55 +0200	240 lines
unsubscribe	Wolfram Saenger	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:21:45 +0200	27 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Bernhard Rupp	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:34:09 -0700	187 lines
Re: Ligand fitting into density	Fischmann, Thierry	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:09:22 -0400	336 lines
Re: Ligand fitting into density	Kendall Nettles	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:24:17 -0400	287 lines
A creative and challenging job in science communication - join PDBe as its Outreach Coordinator!	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:15:49 +0200	59 lines
Re: Ligand fitting into density	[log in to unmask]	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:40:45 -0400	105 lines
.CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error	Yuri Pompeu	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:08:19 +0100	24 lines
Re: Ligand fitting into density	James Kiefer	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:24:35 -0700	184 lines
Re: .CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error	Harry	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:43:37 +0100	42 lines
Re: unsubscribe	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:39:43 +0100	79 lines
Question about PyMol	Harman, Christine	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:17:40 +0000	52 lines
Re: Question about PyMol	James Stroud	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:20:14 -0600	63 lines
Re: Question about PyMol	Harman, Christine	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:24:54 +0000	118 lines
Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Henning Stahlberg	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:51:05 +0200	48 lines
copy FreeR - maintain resolution	Tim Gruene	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:00:43 +0200	48 lines
Reminder: BCA Summer School 2012	Airlie McCoy	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:28 +0100	32 lines
Re: copy FreeR - maintain resolution	Andrey Lebedev	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:26:16 +0000	63 lines
Re: copy FreeR - maintain resolution	Ian Tickle	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:29:44 +0100	70 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:48:59 +0100	156 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Ian Tickle	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:58:50 +0100	103 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:03:26 +0100	238 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Ian Tickle	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:11:16 +0100	137 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Ian Tickle	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:15:41 +0100	148 lines
SUMMARY [ccp4bb] copy FreeR - maintain resolution	Tim Gruene	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:13:26 +0200	110 lines
Re: .CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error	Harry Powell	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:39:48 +0100	139 lines
Last call: CCP4 summer school at APS, in USA	Sanishvili, Ruslan	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:07:43 -0500	370 lines
Defining consensus pattern for searching a motif in protein database(s)	E rajakumar	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:16:43 -0700	57 lines
Re: .CBF raw images in iMOSFLM- error	Kip Guja	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:19:29 -0400	75 lines
Yeast plasmid DNA miniprep problem	Zhang, Zhen	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:27 +0000	97 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Bart Hazes	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:51:57 -0600	178 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Ian Tickle	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:10:11 +0100	151 lines
RESEARCH DIRECTOR IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY/BIOPHYSICS & TENURE-TRACK GROUP LEADERS, Helsinki	Mark J van Raaij	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:00:30 +0200	117 lines
Re: Expanding p4212 coordinates to p1	Henning Stahlberg	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:20:29 +0200	215 lines
symmetry related molecules	Maher Alayyoubi	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:15:46 -0500	19 lines
Re: symmetry related molecules	Bosch, Juergen	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:20:10 -0400	84 lines
Post-doctoral position at Umeå University, Sweden	Karina Persson	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:32:38 +0200	208 lines
Crystal behave funny	Prem kumar	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:51:58 +0800	38759 lines
Re: COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??	Petra Lukacik	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:04:06 +0000	31 lines
Re: Yeast plasmid DNA miniprep problem	Philipp Ellinger	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:29:20 +0200	178 lines
Re: COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??	Paul Emsley	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:20:28 +0100	36 lines
Postdoctoral position in DNA replication/repair at the LMB, Cambridge	Meindert Lamers	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:40:44 +0100	42 lines
wwPDB and CCDC	Paul Emsley	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:14:56 +0100	18 lines
Re: wwPDB and CCDC	Tim Gruene	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:30:38 +0200	53 lines
Re: wwPDB and CCDC	Paul Emsley	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:29:39 +0100	31 lines
Re: Crystal behave funny	Gregory Bowman	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:35:29 -0400	160 lines
Re: wwPDB and CCDC	Randy Read	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:45 +0100	62 lines
Re: wwPDB and CCDC	Gerard DVD Kleywegt	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:40:32 +0200	66 lines
Re: Crystal behave funny	Phoebe Rice	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:32:57 -0500	42 lines
Re: COOT Real Space Refinement keyboard shortcut??	Petra Lukacik	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:42:06 +0000	59 lines
Rigaku R-axis IIC X-ray diffraction system	Ng Chyan Leong	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:48:49 +0100	19 lines
Re: Crystal behave funny	aaleshin	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:37:29 -0700	62 lines
Re: Crystal behave funny	<>	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:49:42 -0400	199 lines
Postdoctoral position in structural and chemical immunology	Yoonsang Cho	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:14:45 -0400	66 lines
Re: Crystal behave funny	Bosch, Juergen	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:15:18 -0400	254 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	James Holton	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:31:55 -0700	133 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Gloria Borgstahl	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:50:20 -0500	197 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	James Holton	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:24:04 -0700	47 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Sabuj Pattanayek	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:27:18 -0500	15 lines
Good way to check ion sites on Coot	Andre Godoy	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:57:12 -0700	28 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	James Stroud	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:08:05 -0600	57 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Sabuj Pattanayek	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:19:41 -0500	39 lines
Re: Good way to check ion sites on Coot	Zhijie Li	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:37:43 -0400	89 lines
Re: Who is using 64-bit Linux?	Pete Meyer	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:45:44 -0500	47 lines
Postdoctoral position at the University of Edinburgh	Julie Welburn	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:45:44 +0100	201 lines
Re: Good way to check ion sites on Coot	Marc Kvansakul	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:08:51 +0000	174 lines
Coot chain ID	Dipankar Manna	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:55:10 +0000	105 lines
Re: Coot chain ID	Antony Oliver	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:54:00 +0000	138 lines
Re: Coot chain ID	Bernhard Lechtenberg	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:46:39 +0100	70 lines
Re: Coot chain ID	Eleanor Dodson	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:22:53 +0100	165 lines
Re: Good way to check ion sites on Coot	Eleanor Dodson	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:24:22 +0100	184 lines
Re: Disorder or poor phases?	Eleanor Dodson	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:31:26 +0100	456 lines
Re: wwPDB and CCDC	Eleanor Dodson	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:33:40 +0100	166 lines
Re: [cnsbb] MTZ label	Edward A. Berry	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:36:18 -0400	103 lines
Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?	Bosch, Juergen	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:28:23 -0400	65 lines
Re: Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?	Richard Gildea	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:33:19 -0700	88 lines
Re: Anybody knows why SSRL is unaccessible ?	Bosch, Juergen	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:35:58 -0400	136 lines
Re: Rigaku R-axis IIC X-ray diffraction system	Jim Pflugrath	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:54:29 +0000	38 lines
unique reflections vs unique observations	Naveed A Nadvi	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:06:01 +0100	37 lines
Re: unique reflections vs unique observations	Andrew Leslie	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:14:12 +0100	103 lines
Re: unique reflections vs unique observations	Jim Pflugrath	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:32:05 +0000	72 lines
fwd:	adam andres	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:52:27 -0700	11 lines
fwd:	adam andres	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:52:27 -0700	11 lines
software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver	Parthasarathy Sampathkumar	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:08:30 -0400	152 lines
Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand	Dipankar Manna	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:52:17 +0000	103 lines
Re: software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver	Parthasarathy Sampathkumar	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:12:39 -0400	69 lines
Re: Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand	jens Preben Morth	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:00:28 +0200	167 lines
Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease	Theresa Hsu	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:31:37 +0100	18 lines
Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease	Tim Gruene	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:10:20 +0200	54 lines
Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease	Dima Klenchin	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:22:43 -0500	25 lines
sodium vs water near	chandan kishore	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:49:16 +0800	40 lines
bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Allister Crow	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:37:00 +0100	6901 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Garib N Murshudov	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:02:10 +0100	171 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:27:50 +0100	162 lines
iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8	Harry Powell	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:28:14 +0100	129 lines
Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease	Florian Brückner	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:52:54 +0200	167 lines
Re: Real Space Refine Zone for Ligand	Paul Emsley	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:06:42 +0100	113 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Keitaro Yamashita	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:09:14 +0900	98 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Garib N Murshudov	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:26:40 +0100	307 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Garib N Murshudov	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:30:11 +0100	309 lines
Re: iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8	Jacob Keller	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:42:38 -0500	291 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Keitaro Yamashita	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:01:00 +0900	198 lines
Re: iMosflm version 1.0.6 & Mosflm version 7.0.8	Phil Evans	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:04:00 +0100	192 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Garib N Murshudov	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:06:55 +0100	504 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Keitaro Yamashita	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:14:26 +0900	326 lines
Re: software to generate protein topology diagram like those available at PDBsum webserver	Parthasarathy Sampathkumar	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:18:33 -0400	108 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Garib N Murshudov	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:21:52 +0100	755 lines
Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease	Jason Forse	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:32:45 +0100	22 lines
Off-pick: suggesiton of puck	Frank	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:35:32 +0100	23 lines
Re: Off-topic-Cleavage with TEV protease	Tim Fenn	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:39:47 -0700	28 lines
Re: Off-pick: suggesiton of puck	Jim Pflugrath	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:51:50 +0000	42 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Tallat Hussain Ghazi	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:40:23 -0700	126 lines
SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..	Qian Sarah	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:58:57 +0800	61 lines
anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV?	Peter Moody	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:58:33 +0100	74 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Dirk Kostrewa	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:08:07 +0200	188 lines
Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..	Tim Gruene	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:15:57 +0200	68 lines
Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..	Uday Kumar	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:03:53 +0100	23 lines
Re: bulk solvent treatment inside protein cavities	Ed Pozharski	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:37:28 -0400	30 lines
Checking in dry shippers?	Frank von Delft	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:59:16 +0100	21 lines
CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC	David Flot	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:00:38 +0200	360 lines
Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..	James Holton	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:13:01 -0700	41 lines
Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..	Mark J van Raaij	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:16:46 +0200	60 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	Frank von Delft	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:03:49 +0100	60 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	Ed Pozharski	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:32:38 -0400	42 lines
Molecular Replacement	Uma Ratu	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:49:43 -0400	60 lines
Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis	Theresa Hsu	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:53:23 +0100	17 lines
Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis	Xun Lu	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:14:37 -0400	36 lines
Re: Molecular Replacement	Edward A. Berry	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:26:59 -0400	39 lines
Re: Molecular Replacement	Uma Ratu	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:09:36 +0930	60 lines
Re: Molecular Replacement	Uma Ratu	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:04:52 +0930	109 lines
Post-Doc position at ICR, London	Alessandro Vannini	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:45:53 +0100	46 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	Frank von Delft	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:44:20 +0100	63 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	<>	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:46:36 +0200	116 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	Frank von Delft	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:50:32 +0100	130 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	<>	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:06:54 +0200	166 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	Ronnie Berntsson	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:53:18 +0200	220 lines
Re: Molecular Replacement	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:59:45 +0100	285 lines
Re: Molecular Replacement	Ed Pozharski	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:44:47 -0400	37 lines
Re: Molecular Replacement	Uma Ratu	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:26:02 -0400	87 lines
Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis	Brett Kroncke	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:07:26 -0400	83 lines
Postdoctoral fellowship for young scientists trained in the UK	Daniel Lietha	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:33:13 +0200	69 lines
Does any software use non- sections in mol2 files	Thomas Womack	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:06:03 +0100	22 lines
Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis‏ (Summary)	Theresa Hsu	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:56:12 +0100	67 lines
hey	adam andres	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:32:48 -0700	14 lines
hey	adam andres	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:33:00 -0700	15 lines
Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Marc Kvansakul	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:34:09 +0000	92 lines
Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances	Sam Jimmeson	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:14:27 -0700	35 lines
Molecular replacement	Krithika Sundaram	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:26:06 +0100	30 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Ed Pozharski	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:16:27 -0400	58 lines
Re: Molecular replacement	Ed Pozharski	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:24:28 -0400	43 lines
Re: Checking in dry shippers?	Bosch, Juergen	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:17:06 -0400	298 lines
Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Zhou, Tongqing (NIH/VRC) [E]	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:26:13 -0400	22 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Bosch, Juergen	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:29:33 -0400	141 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Joel Tyndall	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:56:24 +0000	284 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Vellieux Frederic	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:31:12 +0200	52 lines
phaser: high z score but no sol	LISA	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:20:19 +0800	45 lines
Re: phaser: high z score but no sol	Vellieux Frederic	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:42:27 +0200	50 lines
Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Antony Oliver	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:51:53 +0000	39 lines
hello	adam andres	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:37:20 -0700	15 lines
hello	adam andres	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:37:24 -0700	14 lines
Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances	Thomas Holder	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:52:38 +0200	58 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Remy Loris	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:54:44 +0200	162 lines
Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Tim Gruene	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:01:31 +0200	73 lines
Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Saul Hazledine	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:03:35 +0200	38 lines
Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances	Tim Gruene	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:07:37 +0200	67 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Yu Wai Chen	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:34:17 +0100	132 lines
Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances	Randy Read	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:45:58 +0100	52 lines
Re: phaser: high z score but no sol	Randy Read	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:53:41 +0100	53 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Boaz Shaanan	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:24:40 +0000	275 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Francois Berenger	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:25:02 +0900	41 lines
Postdoc position in structural biology	Charles Ballard	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:29:11 +0100	157 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Marc Kvansakul	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:09:51 +0000	67 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Jobichen Chacko	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:12:24 +0800	59 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Enrico Stura	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:34:26 +0200	103 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	<>	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:54:25 +0200	90 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Colin Groom	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:09:50 +0100	122 lines
Re: phaser: high z score but no sol	Ed Pozharski	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:21:05 -0400	39 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	George M. Sheldrick	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:55:46 +0200	161 lines
Re: Molecular replacement	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:00:28 +0100	134 lines
Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances	Robert Campbell	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:03:37 -0400	85 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Antony Oliver	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:09:03 +0000	189 lines
Re: Molecular replacement	Jacob Keller	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:11:56 -0500	169 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Randy Read	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:27 +0100	256 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Ian Tickle	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:47:33 +0100	23 lines
Job opportunity: Postdoctoral researcher	Mark Banfield (JIC)	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:56:15 +0000	200 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Antony Oliver	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:10:02 +0000	261 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Antony Oliver	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:18:00 +0000	46 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Tom Oldfield	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:21:06 +0100	188 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Antony Oliver	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:26:01 +0000	230 lines
Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Victor Lamzin	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:52:20 +0200	116 lines
Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Antony Oliver	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:57:16 +0000	121 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Maria Sola i Vilarrubias	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:58:49 +0200	376 lines
Re: Finding N-term to C-term Distances	Thomas Holder	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:06:45 +0200	32 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Maria Sola i Vilarrubias	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:14:53 +0200	476 lines
Re: Arp/WARP for multi-chain complex	Zhou, Tongqing (NIH/VRC) [E]	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:20:09 -0400	157 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Ravi Nookala	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:34:30 +0100	665 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Patrick Loll	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:42:12 -0400	57 lines
indexing(?) question in P21	wtempel	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:35:25 -0400	53 lines
Re: indexing(?) question in P21	Phil Jeffrey	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:27 -0400	40 lines
Rif: [ccp4bb] indexing(?) question in P21	Fulvio Saccoccia	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:10:12 +0200	38 lines
Re: Molecular replacement	Roger Rowlett	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:33:02 -0400	37 lines
Re: Molecular replacement	Bret Wallace	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:43:16 +0100	19 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	aaleshin	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:48:20 -0700	67 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Miguel Ortiz Lombardia	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:10:16 +0200	113 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Bosch, Juergen	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:34:58 -0400	442 lines
indexing(?) question in P21 - solved	wtempel	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:28:26 -0400	44 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	aaleshin	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:08:21 -0700	548 lines
Re: indexing(?) question in P21 - solved	Bryan Lepore	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:34:44 -0400	23 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Edward A. Berry	Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:18:12 -0400	29 lines
Re: phaser: high z score but no sol	<>	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:55:17 +0200	148 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	<>	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:47:43 +0200	138 lines
three letter codes for buffer components	Ruth Brenk	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:33:03 +0100	35 lines
Re: Molecular replacement	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:40:21 +0100	55 lines
Re: three letter codes for buffer components	Carlos Frazao	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:20:35 +0100	60 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Patrick Shaw Stewart	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:23:02 +0100	184 lines
PhD position - Institut de Biologie Structurale (Grenoble)	David Cobessi	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:29:28 +0200	87 lines
Re: three letter codes for buffer components	Matthew BOWLER	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:57 +0200	57 lines
Re: three letter codes for buffer components	Rajintha Bandaranayake	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:11:46 -0400	48 lines
new XDS version	Kay Diederichs	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:16:26 +0200	135 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Manoj Tiwari	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:07:50 -0400	253 lines
Re: Off-topic: Site-directed mutagenesis	Roger Rowlett	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:27:56 -0400	49 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Ed Pozharski	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:01:28 -0400	63 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Ed Pozharski	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:08:39 -0400	56 lines
Re: phaser: high z score but no sol	Bosch, Juergen	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:09:19 -0400	125 lines
Re: phaser: high z score but no sol	Francis E Reyes	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:14:28 -0600	37 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Sankaranarayanan Rajan	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:57:28 +0530	254 lines
job vacancy at Proteros	Krapp, Stephan	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:52:53 +0200	447 lines
high temp factor in coot!	Arka Chakraborty	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:44:29 +0530	50 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Bernhard Rupp	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:28:08 -0700	176 lines
refining beta peptides	Richard Baxter	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:34:51 -0400	28 lines
Membrane protein purification with HIC	Theresa Hsu	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:39:22 +0100	19 lines
Re: refining beta peptides	Garib N Murshudov	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:44:45 +0100	151 lines
fwd:	E rajakumar	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:24:17 -0700	13 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Arka Chakraborty	Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:47:51 +0530	180 lines
finding NCS in water	Rajesh Kumar	Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:33:11 -0500	77 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Van Den Berg, Bert	Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:35:17 +0000	85 lines
OASIS new version released	Fan, Hai-fu	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:32:13 +0800	72 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	<>	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:24:12 +0200	302 lines
21-23 May workshop on Integrated Software for Integrative Structural Biology	Chris Morris	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:55:44 +0000	80 lines
Re: finding NCS in water	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:19:09 +0100	108 lines
Re: finding NCS in water	Rajesh Kumar	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:35:50 -0500	139 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Ed Pozharski	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:53:13 -0400	24 lines
Re: SeMet protein behaves much different with native protein..	Qian Sarah	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:05:31 +0800	58 lines
high R factor calculated by sfcheck	Qixu Cai	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:39:59 +0800	20 lines
CALL FOR BEAM TIME PROPOSALS: The Protein Crystallography Station @ LANL	Suzanne Zoe Fisher	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:57:50 -0600	131 lines
Re: high R factor calculated by sfcheck	Ed Pozharski	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:04:20 -0400	31 lines
FW: error	Oganesyan, Vaheh	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:34:19 +0000	48 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Qixu Cai	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:13:14 +0800	33 lines
minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column	Jerry McCully	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:37:52 -0700	66 lines
Re: minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column	Zhijie Li	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:46 -0400	141 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Qixu Cai	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:21:54 +0800	71 lines
Criteria for Ligand fitting	Naveed A Nadvi	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:02:15 +0100	51 lines
HI	aneesh goyal	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:38:15 -0700	15 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	<>	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:25:58 +0200	91 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Tim Gruene	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:01:33 +0200	107 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Qixu Cai	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:30:18 +0800	205 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	Pandit, Jayvardhan	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:55:49 +0000	63 lines
Re: high temp factor in coot!	Ed Pozharski	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:14:40 -0400	42 lines
Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	David Gallagher	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:20:42 +0100	111 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	Colin Groom	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:22:28 +0100	113 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	Kelly Daughtry	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:52:01 -0400	166 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	Enrico Stura	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:00:36 +0200	97 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	Bryan Lepore	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:52:04 -0400	44 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	Nian Huang	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:52:43 -0500	192 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	Peter Moody	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:57:10 +0100	133 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	Patrick Loll	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:09:04 -0400	66 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	David Gallagher	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:23:45 +0100	327 lines
hey	E rajakumar	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:56:41 -0700	13 lines
Re: Anaerobic glovebox crystal cryo-cooling	Steiner, Roberto	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:05:29 +0100	182 lines
"resolution" on PDB web page	Phoebe Rice	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:23:44 -0500	21 lines
HELLO	abhishek dey	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:26:35 +0800	13 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	Naveed A Nadvi	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 04:25:16 +0100	68 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Jan Dohnalek	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:41:00 +0200	120 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Mark J van Raaij	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:10:51 +0200	83 lines
REMINDER CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR ESRF BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE MICROSPEC	David Flot	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:21:10 +0200	363 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Jan Dohnalek	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:31:15 +0200	211 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Edward A. Berry	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:55:17 -0400	82 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Mike Sleutel	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:09:09 +0200	86 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Miller, Mitchell D.	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:33:29 -0700	131 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Edward A. Berry	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:08:52 -0400	124 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Phoebe Rice	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:38:29 -0500	143 lines
Re: aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)	George Sheldrick	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:40:54 +0200	59 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Frank von Delft	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:43:45 +0100	132 lines
how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10	Michael Murphy	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:54:59 -0400	59 lines
Re: how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10	Tim Gruene	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:59:31 +0200	65 lines
aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)	Bryan Lepore	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:00:24 -0400	21 lines
Re: aimless and anisotropic scaling (and the docs?)	Phil Evans	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:19:24 +0100	40 lines
British Biophysical Society Meeting in Durham July 11-13.	POHL E.	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:28:38 +0100	13424 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	Dale Tronrud	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:37:53 -0700	39 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	James Holton	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:40:01 -0700	229 lines
Re: how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10	AFL	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:42:35 +0200	46 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Ethan Merritt	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:01:01 -0700	28 lines
Re: how to install coot on ubuntu 11.10	Miguel Ortiz Lombardia	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:00:13 +0200	102 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	H. Raaijmakers	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:29:28 +0200	82 lines
Re: "resolution" on PDB web page	Jacob Keller	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:41:09 -0500	220 lines
content calculation in phaser	Leonard Thomas	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:04:47 -0500	42 lines
Re: minimum protein concentration for NI-NTA column	Thomas Cleveland	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:56:36 -0400	67 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Jeremy Tame	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:10:56 +0900	1471 lines
Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Jrh	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:02:05 +0100	117 lines
Final Reminder: BCA/CCP4 Summer School 2012	Airlie McCoy	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:25:58 +0100	23 lines
Re: Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Gerard Bricogne	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:33:06 +0100	81 lines
Re: Criteria for Ligand fitting	<>	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:19:51 +0200	102 lines
heavy precipitattion of selenomethionine labelled proteins	supratim dey	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:55:08 +0530	40 lines
Inverted Micelles and Crystallization	Jacob Keller	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:45:35 -0500	45 lines
commercially available proteins	Peter Hsu	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:29:16 +0100	27 lines
Re: commercially available proteins	Bosch, Juergen	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:55:31 -0400	94 lines
Refmac and sigma value	Uma Ratu	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:38:14 -0400	59 lines
Re: Refmac and sigma value	Uma Ratu	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:26:21 -0400	102 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	Jacob Keller	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:39:53 -0500	84 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	yybbll	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:52:48 +0200	94 lines
negative density at some places in the side chain of residues	Alaksa	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:23:09 +0530	15742 lines
Re: negative density at some places in the side chain of residues	Antony Oliver	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:03:11 +0000	51 lines
Re: content calculation in phaser	Leonard Thomas	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:18:29 -0500	71 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	Van Den Berg, Bert	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:32:06 +0000	92 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	Veer Bhatt	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:38:22 -0700	87 lines
fwd:	aneesh goyal	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:10:50 -0700	15 lines
Re: Refmac and sigma value	Robert Nicholls	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:24:42 +0100	146 lines
Summary Re: anyone scrapping an Raxis-IV?	Peter Moody	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:54:59 +0100	129 lines
Re: Refmac and sigma value	<>	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:04:11 +0200	277 lines
Re: Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Mark J van Raaij	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:40:02 +0200	127 lines
Re: Refmac and sigma value	Robbie Joosten	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:57:29 +0200	301 lines
detergent crystal?	于洪军	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:07:21 -0500	6677 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	于洪军	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:05:35 -0500	1559 lines
Re: commercially available proteins	Stephen Weeks	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:13:35 +0200	74 lines
Re: Refmac and sigma value	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:25:59 +0100	327 lines
Re: negative density at some places in the side chain of residues	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:32:32 +0100	140 lines
X-PLOR	Nadir T. Mrabet	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:34:13 +0200	35 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	R. M. Garavito	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:40:47 -0400	321 lines
protease inhibitor	rashmi panigrahi	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:41:28 +0800	29 lines
Re: Refmac and sigma value	Uma Ratu	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:53:42 -0400	362 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	Jacob Keller	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:54:57 -0500	309 lines
Re: X-PLOR	Francisco Hernandez-Guzman	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:59:23 -0700	55 lines
Re: detergent crystal?	R. M. Garavito	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:17:29 -0400	515 lines
Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	Florian Schmitzberger	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:23:13 -0400	201 lines
Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	Mark J van Raaij	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:35:42 +0200	69 lines
Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	Florian Schmitzberger	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:42:09 -0400	305 lines
Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	Ethan Merritt	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:54:20 -0700	56 lines
Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	Jens Kaiser	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:54:24 -0700	65 lines
water picking	Oganesyan, Vaheh	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:11:19 +0000	172 lines
Anisotropic diffraction	Theresa Hsu	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:18:47 +0100	19 lines
Re: Anisotropic diffraction	David Schuller	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:21:05 -0400	33 lines
Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	Miller, Mitchell D.	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:23:41 -0700	67 lines
Re: Off-topic: PDB deposition of multiple structure factor files	VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:18:08 +0200	123 lines
MAMCM reminder	David R. Cooper	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:23:22 -0400	32 lines
Re: water picking	Tim Gruene	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:24:01 +0200	73 lines
Re: Anisotropic diffraction	chen c	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:28:04 +0800	67 lines
hello	Saumen Datta	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:50:53 -0700	15 lines
Re: Anisotropic diffraction	Zhijie Li	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:06:21 -0400	56 lines
A topical one...Re: [ccp4bb] Publication ethics Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: Supplying PDB file to reviewers	Jrh	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:08:06 +0200	141 lines
CSX2012 Spectroscopy & X-ray Workshop, 4.-6. July, ETHZ	Martin Fuchs	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:49:10 +0200	69 lines
Ligand geometry	Uma Ratu	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:47:58 -0400	70 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	Robbie Joosten	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:49:59 +0200	123 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	H. Raaijmakers	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:14:01 +0200	54 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	Eleanor Dodson	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:32:58 +0100	155 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	Robbie Joosten	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:56:42 +0200	147 lines
Re: Anisotropic diffraction	Dale Tronrud	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:12:52 -0700	64 lines
Re: Anisotropic diffraction	Zhijie Li	Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0400	225 lines
Image names	Graeme Winter	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:19:58 +0100	30 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	Paul Emsley	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:00:41 +0100	186 lines
Problem with indexing in the latest iMosflm release	A Leslie	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:52:09 +0100	706 lines
Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	Ke, Jiyuan	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:41:54 +0000	143 lines
Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	Roger Rowlett	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:01:19 -0400	230 lines
Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	David Schuller	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:33:59 -0400	187 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	Uma Ratu	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:55:43 -0400	1075 lines
Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	Savvas Savvides	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:21:30 +0200	137 lines
postdoctoral position at Sanford-Burnham, San Diego, CA	Rongsheng Jin	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:13:37 -0700	129 lines
Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	<>	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:20:55 -0400	227 lines
Re: Ligand geometry	Bernhard C. Lohkamp	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:45:03 +0200	120 lines
Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	Jacob Keller	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:53:15 -0500	231 lines
Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit	Roger Rowlett	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:09:56 -0400	247 lines

CCP4BB Archives

April 2012

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives