|
|
|
Size
|
DCAM editors' - Wed Jan 4, 9:00 EST - Agenda
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:53:06 -0500 |
65 lines |
Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:19:21 -0500 |
117 lines |
DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:40:11 -0500 |
46 lines |
Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:01:29 -0500 |
64 lines |
DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:11:15 -0500 |
48 lines |
DCAM Proposal - summary
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:59:21 -0500 |
50 lines |
DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:56:36 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal
|
Karen Coyle |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:15:44 -0800 |
155 lines |
Re: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)
|
Antoine Isaac |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:14:01 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:17:31 +0000 |
145 lines |
Re: DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement
|
Antoine Isaac |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:38:37 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Antoine Isaac |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:09:49 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:35:27 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal
|
Antoine Isaac |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:39:08 +0100 |
130 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Antoine Isaac |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:49:43 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:29:50 +0000 |
83 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Karen Coyle |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 07:20:42 -0800 |
120 lines |
Re: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)
|
Mark Diggory |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:17:55 -0800 |
195 lines |
thesis...RE: DCAM entities for DescribedResourceId and ValueId (local non-URI identifiers)
|
Greenberg, Jane |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:41:49 +0000 |
291 lines |
RCAM Revision Tech
|
Kai Eckert |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:55:50 +0100 |
30 lines |
2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:20:17 -0500 |
147 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Antoine Isaac |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:40:53 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:50:17 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:46:30 -0500 |
22 lines |
Literals in DCAM: labels, notations, ...others?
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:41:48 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: DCAM - detail re: grouping constructs for the technical editors
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:55:27 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:58:10 +0000 |
228 lines |
Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Karen Coyle |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:46:18 -0800 |
256 lines |
Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Kai Eckert |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:40:59 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Kai Eckert |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:02:49 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement
|
Kai Eckert |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:10:05 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Revising (and simplifying) DCAM terminology - a proposal
|
Kai Eckert |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:27:43 +0100 |
183 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Antoine Isaac |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:47:50 +0100 |
106 lines |
Re: DCAM Statement versus RDF Statement -> "Slots" and "Boxes" ?
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:54:01 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Literals in DCAM: labels, notations, ...others?
|
Antoine Isaac |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:13:31 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:58:59 +0000 |
77 lines |
Schema.org Alignment Task Group telecon next Monday, 2012-01-09 ?
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:16:49 -0500 |
338 lines |
Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Andy Powell |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:11:08 +0000 |
110 lines |
Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Thomas Baker |
Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:11:39 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Baden Hughes |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:27:24 +1100 |
74 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Bernard Vatant |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:43:10 +0100 |
221 lines |
Re: 2011-01-04 DCAM editors' call - report
|
Kai Eckert |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:14:22 +0100 |
119 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:15:09 -0500 |
240 lines |
Microdata to RDF (dvcs.w3.org)
|
Jon Phipps |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:09:31 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Arquette,Mark K |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:03:17 -0600 |
75 lines |
Schema.org Alignment Task Group *informal* telecon - TODAY
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:06:51 -0500 |
374 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Jon Phipps |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:49:10 -0500 |
160 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Corey A Harper |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:02:14 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Mark A. Matienzo |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:51:25 -0500 |
114 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Corey A Harper |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:13:08 -0500 |
142 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Peter Ring |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:34:27 +0100 |
334 lines |
Re: Value Strings with different roles in the Description Set Model
|
Antoine Isaac |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:28:09 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:15:05 -0500 |
358 lines |
AW: Issues tracker needed! What is your experience?
|
Fischer, Thomas |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:24:09 +0100 |
118 lines |
Heads up: DCAM telecon on Monday, 30 January, 11:00 EST
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:44:15 -0500 |
26 lines |
Monday's informal Schema.org Alignment call - report
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:13:26 -0500 |
105 lines |
Issues trackers - summary of discussion
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:39:33 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Issues trackers - summary of discussion
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:01:19 -0500 |
37 lines |
Drafts Published by the W3C HTML Data Task Force
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:54:39 +0000 |
44 lines |
DCAM: the analogy to SKOS
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:30:48 -0500 |
103 lines |
DCAM telecon - 2012-01-30 Monday, 1100 EST
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:53:02 -0500 |
68 lines |
DCAP:DCAM
|
Jon Phipps |
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:25:11 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: DCAP:DCAM
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:22:20 -0500 |
94 lines |
Re: DCAP:DCAM
|
Jon Phipps |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:27:39 -0500 |
301 lines |
Re: DCAP:DCAM
|
Antoine Isaac |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:53:22 +0100 |
29 lines |