|
|
|
Size
|
Re: -bptf sigma formula
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:33:06 +0100 |
236 lines |
Re: -bptf sigma formula
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:29:56 +0100 |
164 lines |
Re: -bptf sigma formula
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:22:32 +0100 |
124 lines |
-bptf sigma formula
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:47:46 +0100 |
40 lines |
-cpval in fslmaths?
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:15:33 +0800 |
227 lines |
Re: 1st level feat in standard space
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:51:47 +0100 |
95 lines |
1st level feat in standard space
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:27:19 +0100 |
22 lines |
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:11:28 -0700 |
14 lines |
Re: A question with regards to TBSS
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:11:49 -0500 |
224 lines |
Re: about randomise question
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:18:35 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: about randomise question
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:43:27 +0100 |
49 lines |
about randomise question
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:12:18 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: About TBSS results
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:42:05 +0100 |
365 lines |
Re: About TBSS results
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:47:27 -0400 |
305 lines |
Re: About TBSS results
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:06:13 +0200 |
71 lines |
Re: About TBSS results
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:15:48 +0900 |
159 lines |
Re: About TBSS results
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:47:52 +0200 |
195 lines |
Re: About TBSS results
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:06:02 +0200 |
75 lines |
About TBSS results
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:01:59 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: About the CMA labels
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:53:48 +0100 |
45 lines |
About the CMA labels
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:14:21 -0700 |
32 lines |
ADHD-200 Global Competition Results Now Posted
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:27:42 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: altered design
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:53:28 -0500 |
1158 lines |
Re: altered design
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:16:25 +0200 |
1039 lines |
Re: altered design
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:00:12 -0500 |
863 lines |
Re: altered design
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:15:18 +0200 |
754 lines |
Re: altered design
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:16:24 +0100 |
141 lines |
altered design
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:08:25 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:14:00 -0400 |
124 lines |
Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:50:39 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:42:06 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:19:44 -0400 |
23 lines |
applywarp --interp default, how to shut off??
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:13:04 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: atlas masks
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:08:02 +0200 |
135 lines |
Re: atlas masks
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:22:56 +0100 |
129 lines |
Re: atlas masks
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:15:57 +0200 |
110 lines |
Re: atlas masks
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:12:13 +0100 |
75 lines |
atlas masks
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:59:55 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: atlases masks parceling
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:02:12 +0100 |
74 lines |
atlases masks parceling
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:22:35 +0000 |
55 lines |
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:12:49 +0200 |
113 lines |
Re: AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:38:52 +0200 |
403 lines |
Re: AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:37:21 +0100 |
393 lines |
AW: [FSL] Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:25:20 +0200 |
313 lines |
Re: bash or dash?
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:21:48 -0400 |
34 lines |
bash or dash?
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:16:38 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:31:32 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:51:23 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:00:17 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:24:19 -0500 |
419 lines |
Re: bedpostx parallel via SGE ?
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:19:45 +0100 |
113 lines |
bedpostx parallel via SGE ?
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:29:24 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Brain/background threshold, % question
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:03:59 -0300 |
83 lines |
Re: Brain/background threshold, % question
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:57:18 +0100 |
78 lines |
Brain/background threshold, % question
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:58:47 -0300 |
34 lines |
Re: bvals and bvects for dti
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:15:02 +0000 |
126 lines |
Re: bvals and bvects for dti
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:18:01 +0100 |
18 lines |
bvals and bvects for dti
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:13:20 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: calv VOI length
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:05:20 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: calv VOI length
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:41:58 +0200 |
27 lines |
calv VOI length
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:29:42 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: categorical covariate in vertex analysis
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:24:13 -0300 |
74 lines |
categorical covariate in vertex analysis
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:38:05 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:34:40 -0500 |
116 lines |
Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 07:49:51 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:59:13 -0400 |
103 lines |
Re: Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:15:29 +0100 |
157 lines |
Clarity on a 2x2 repeated measures design
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:50:54 +0100 |
177 lines |
Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:45:54 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:17:36 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:44:58 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:34:50 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: Confusion between DTI and DWI data
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:12:42 +0200 |
243 lines |
Confusion between DTI and DWI data
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:52:22 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:44:13 -0400 |
151 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:06:23 +0200 |
172 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:40:54 -0400 |
190 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:00:47 +0200 |
107 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:35:50 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:16:10 +0200 |
101 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:59:27 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:29:41 +0100 |
153 lines |
Re: convert melodic_oIC to melodic_IC
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:58:43 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:34:57 +0800 |
119 lines |
Re: could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:03:12 -0400 |
51 lines |
could anyone recommend a rat brain atlas?
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:46:04 +0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Create two masks from one by supplying coordinates of bounding plane
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:02:12 +0200 |
39 lines |
Create two masks from one by supplying coordinates of bounding plane
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:42:37 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:39:06 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:11:42 +0200 |
74 lines |
csf /edge in melodic & dual_reg
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:23:32 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: dicom 2 nifti
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:12:00 -0300 |
26 lines |
Re: dicom 2 nifti
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:15:10 +0100 |
27 lines |
dicom 2 nifti
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:00:31 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Different TRs in DTI acqusitions
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:04:06 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Different TRs in DTI acqusitions
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:41:08 -0500 |
39 lines |
Different TRs in DTI acqusitions
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:16:00 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: Diffusion tensor estimation method
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:07:44 +0100 |
34 lines |
Diffusion tensor estimation method
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:03:41 +0200 |
20 lines |
Re: Download failure
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:47:26 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Download failure
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:38:50 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Download failure
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:31:23 +0100 |
27 lines |
Download failure
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:49:52 +0100 |
17 lines |
download version 4.1.5
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:55:52 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: DTI
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:02:54 -0400 |
369 lines |
Re: DTI
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:43:25 +0100 |
418 lines |
Re: DTI
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:42:16 +0100 |
290 lines |
Re: DTI
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:40:00 -0400 |
162 lines |
Re: DTI
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:52:31 -0400 |
152 lines |
Re: DTI
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:45:18 +0100 |
60 lines |
DTI
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:11:09 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: dtifit_question
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:43:32 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: dtifit_question
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:19:56 +0100 |
44 lines |
dtifit_question
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:25:53 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: dual regression
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:24:33 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: dual regression
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:22:41 +0200 |
30 lines |
dual regression
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:12:32 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: dual regression - 2 level 2 factors, nultiple runs per subject
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:48:14 +0200 |
50 lines |
dual regression - 2 level 2 factors, nultiple runs per subject
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:26:10 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:58:50 +0200 |
145 lines |
Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:28:19 +0100 |
211 lines |
Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:24:40 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:20:57 +0200 |
70 lines |
Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:39:03 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:42:28 +0000 |
45 lines |
Dual Regression - dr_stage1 only "-nan"?!
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:03:26 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: dual regression stage 3
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:23:48 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:41:05 +0100 |
246 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:50:02 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:19:19 +0200 |
104 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:53:29 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 23:18:27 +0200 |
71 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 17:01:47 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:45:44 +0200 |
58 lines |
Re: Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:22:23 -0400 |
35 lines |
Dual Regression using two disparate groups of subjects
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:16:41 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: dual regression: correlate RSN with behavioural data with multiple factors
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:38:59 +0200 |
53 lines |
dual regression: correlate RSN with behavioural data with multiple factors
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:06:46 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:29:16 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:14:06 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:12:02 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:57:37 -0400 |
204 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:13:49 +0100 |
192 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:11:11 -0400 |
125 lines |
Re: Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:56:35 +0100 |
113 lines |
Dual_regression: failed to find maskall
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:51:54 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Eddy current corrections not working
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:07:53 +0100 |
30 lines |
Eddy current corrections not working
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:46 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: Error Running FSL
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:12:17 +0100 |
96 lines |
Error Running FSL
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:44:54 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:57:08 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:15:54 +0100 |
97 lines |
Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:05:05 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:09:41 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:43:08 +0100 |
42 lines |
Errors: data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number of entries
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:05:26 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: extra tracts with waypoint and termination mask
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:38:00 +0100 |
44 lines |
extra tracts with waypoint and termination mask
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:16:19 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:44:45 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:15:14 +0100 |
39 lines |
False positive rate corresponding to uncorrected p-value/minimum cluster size?
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:00:15 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: FAST bug
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:41:14 +0200 |
90 lines |
Re: FAST bug
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:51:23 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: FAST bug
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 09:33:02 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: FAST bug
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:17:01 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: FAST bug
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:08:28 -0500 |
59 lines |
FAST bug
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:00:32 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: FEAT troubleshoot
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:49:34 +0000 |
14 lines |
Re: FEAT troubleshoot
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:32:57 +0000 |
118 lines |
FEAT troubleshoot
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:13:11 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: FEAT under Mac Lion
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:51:47 +0800 |
70 lines |
Re: FEAT under Mac Lion
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:40:20 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: FEAT under Mac Lion
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:30:26 -0500 |
50 lines |
FEAT under Mac Lion
|
Sat, 1 Oct 2011 18:37:01 +0800 |
14 lines |
Re: FEAT: High Pass Filtering
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:57:22 +0100 |
313 lines |
Re: FEAT: High Pass Filtering
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:41:39 -0500 |
244 lines |
Re: FEAT: High Pass Filtering
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:03:21 +0100 |
111 lines |
FEAT: High Pass Filtering
|
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:00:21 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: FEAT: High-pass temporal filtering in mirrored design
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:25:54 +0100 |
120 lines |
FEAT: High-pass temporal filtering in mirrored design
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:22:51 -0400 |
36 lines |
Featquery crash
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:49:15 -0700 |
216 lines |
FEEDS failed
|
Sat, 1 Oct 2011 01:21:49 -0400 |
182 lines |
Re: Fieldmap
|
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:10:54 -0400 |
319 lines |
Re: fieldmap help
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 00:49:46 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: film_gls to generate COPE images for longistudinal TBSS
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:05:14 +0100 |
283 lines |
film_gls to generate COPE images for longistudinal TBSS
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:12:16 +1100 |
286 lines |
Re: fisher r to z for resting state fmri
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:27:05 -0500 |
155 lines |
Re: fisher r to z for resting state fmri
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:14:31 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: fisher r to z for resting state fmri
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:28:28 -0500 |
81 lines |
fisher r to z for resting state fmri
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:02:13 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Flip an image: fslswapdim problem
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:08:48 +0100 |
12 lines |
Re: Flip an image: fslswapdim problem
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:35:15 +0100 |
56 lines |
Flip an image: fslswapdim problem
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:59:19 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:48:02 -0400 |
1105 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:44:58 +0100 |
1080 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:40:21 -0400 |
1029 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:50:47 -0400 |
413 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:35:31 -0400 |
787 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:14:56 -0400 |
359 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:38:36 -0400 |
1227 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:09:55 -0500 |
1498 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:59:38 +0000 |
687 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:00:33 -0400 |
661 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:46:21 -0400 |
591 lines |
Re: FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:37:46 -0500 |
725 lines |
FLIRT - Nearest Neighbor option failing
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:24:24 -0400 |
164 lines |
Re: FLIRT outside FEAT
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:13:27 +0100 |
100 lines |
FLIRT outside FEAT
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:41:33 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Form clusters by local max or mean?
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:45:33 +0100 |
46 lines |
Form clusters by local max or mean?
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:09:20 +0100 |
35 lines |
FSL 4.1.8 using gcc 4.5.1: patch
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:42:08 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: FSL 4.1.9
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:37:01 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: FSL 4.1.9
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:50:49 +0200 |
28 lines |
FSL 4.1.9
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:27:53 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:37:31 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:29:29 +0100 |
32 lines |
FSL 4.1.9 - fslroi
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:02:30 +0200 |
24 lines |
Re: fsl and MAC lion
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:02:58 +0100 |
65 lines |
fsl and MAC lion
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:09:14 +0800 |
63 lines |
Re: FSL Digest - 25 Oct 2011 to 26 Oct 2011 (#2011-296)
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:29:56 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: FSL Digest - 25 Oct 2011 to 26 Oct 2011 (#2011-296)
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:47:46 -0300 |
39 lines |
fslcc input voxels
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:49:41 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:14:02 +0100 |
273 lines |
Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:11:45 +0200 |
264 lines |
Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:40:29 +0100 |
190 lines |
Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:02:31 +0200 |
154 lines |
Re: fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:09:43 +0100 |
61 lines |
fslmaths / fslstats on 4D images
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:36:20 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: fslmaths on stats files
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:36:16 +0100 |
354 lines |
Re: fslmaths on stats files
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:33:40 +0100 |
317 lines |
Re: fslmaths on stats files
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:09:33 +0100 |
138 lines |
Re: fslmaths on stats files
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:23:37 +0100 |
195 lines |
Re: fslmaths on stats files
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:31:44 +0100 |
106 lines |
fslmaths on stats files
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:14:03 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: FSLVIEW for Ubuntu 11.10 ?...
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:24:02 +0200 |
35 lines |
FSLVIEW for Ubuntu 11.10 ?...
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:15:25 -0300 |
18 lines |
Re: FSLview Mac OSX problem
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:31:47 +0100 |
26 lines |
FSLview Mac OSX problem
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:52:41 +0100 |
35 lines |
FSLView version that does not rely on Qt3?
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:47:31 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: fsl_glm and demean option
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:21:24 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: fsl_glm and demean option
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:59:01 +0100 |
127 lines |
fsl_glm and demean option
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:13:46 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: fsl_glm and second-level ICA
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:50:45 +0100 |
297 lines |
Re: fsl_glm and second-level ICA
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:23:37 +0200 |
65 lines |
fsl_glm and second-level ICA
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:50:43 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: fsl_randomise_problem?
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:30:58 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: fsl_randomise_problem?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:23:59 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: fsl_regfilt
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:53:10 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: fsl_regfilt
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:30:14 +0200 |
33 lines |
fsl_regfilt
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:23:36 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:25:00 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:00:23 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:50:34 +0100 |
102 lines |
fsl_regfilt and dof for group analysis
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:40:01 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:52:58 +0000 |
133 lines |
Re: getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:14:28 +0100 |
93 lines |
getting MAT, CON, FTS into Glm without FSF
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:47:49 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: GLM: is mean regressor mandatory for correlation analysis ???
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:44:24 -0400 |
61 lines |
GLM: is mean regressor mandatory for correlation analysis ???
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:21:12 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: gradient table correction and avscale output
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:05:20 +0100 |
105 lines |
Re: gradient table correction and avscale output
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:48:52 +0100 |
90 lines |
Re: gradient table correction and avscale output
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:11:08 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: gradient table correction and avscale output
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:46:52 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: gradient table correction and avscale output
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:55:25 +0100 |
68 lines |
gradient table correction and avscale output
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:29:29 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: group analysis on seed-based connectivity data
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:29:43 -0500 |
104 lines |
group analysis on seed-based connectivity data
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:18:11 +0100 |
30 lines |
group-level FEAT on repeated measures (using baseline as voxel-wise covariate)
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:13:52 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Having some problems with VBM tool
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:24:15 +0000 |
143 lines |
Having some problems with VBM tool
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:17:24 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: help with Spacial Smoothing
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:42:38 -0400 |
44 lines |
help with Spacial Smoothing
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:32:33 -0400 |
39 lines |
how avscale works?
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:54:04 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:28:12 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:07:31 -0400 |
146 lines |
Re: how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:43:09 -0400 |
59 lines |
how to correlate a behavioral measures with fmri-data?
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:30:40 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: How to do cluster-based thresholding after running randomise?
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:32:50 -0500 |
100 lines |
How to do cluster-based thresholding after running randomise?
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:24:40 +0800 |
60 lines |
Re: How to register MD to standard space
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:12:37 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: How to register MD to standard space
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:58:51 +0800 |
452 lines |
Re: How to register MD to standard space
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:55:22 -0500 |
590 lines |
Re: How to register MD to standard space
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:33:03 +0800 |
127 lines |
Re: How to register MD to standard space
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:15:15 +0100 |
58 lines |
How to register MD to standard space
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:25:36 +0800 |
48 lines |
Re: I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:13:16 +0200 |
106 lines |
Re: I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:32:39 +0200 |
73 lines |
I 'm lookig for a free spectroscopy program for multi voxel, could you help me?
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:02:35 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: ICA reproducibility
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:03:25 +0200 |
57 lines |
ICA reproducibility
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:44:43 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: identify TBSS_results
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:59:29 +0100 |
105 lines |
identify TBSS_results
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:41:41 +0100 |
26 lines |
Identify tracts in cluster command
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:47:56 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Identify tracts in cluster command
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:00:35 +0100 |
109 lines |
Identify tracts in cluster command
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:33:03 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: incorrect TR in header after running flirt
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:57:10 +0100 |
104 lines |
incorrect TR in header after running flirt
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:07:43 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Juelich VOI Extraction
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:26:45 -0400 |
88 lines |
Juelich VOI Extraction
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:38:59 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: masks of non-cluster-corrected clusters?
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:12:00 +0100 |
108 lines |
masks of non-cluster-corrected clusters?
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:51:29 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:45:26 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:55:53 +0100 |
13 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:16:11 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:39:40 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:22:59 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:11:46 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:06:11 -0400 |
36 lines |
MELODIC and different matrix sizes
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:51:05 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:57:01 +0100 |
13 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:27:12 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:11:04 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:26:40 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:19:36 +0200 |
61 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:12:29 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:10:18 +0100 |
115 lines |
Melodic and dualreg procedure
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:25:27 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: melodic and masking
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:31:01 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: melodic and masking
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:47:12 -0400 |
47 lines |
melodic and masking
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:38:45 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:56:20 +0100 |
13 lines |
Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:42:12 +0200 |
97 lines |
Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:57:41 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: MELODIC and missing fieldmaps
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:31:39 +0100 |
100 lines |
MELODIC and missing fieldmaps
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:44:02 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: Melodic crashes with memory allocation error
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:42:21 +0100 |
102 lines |
Melodic crashes with memory allocation error
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:27:06 +0300 |
30 lines |
Re: MELODIC failed
|
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:16:07 -0400 |
138 lines |
MELODIC failed
|
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:06:40 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:44:17 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:19:26 +0100 |
111 lines |
MELODIC for resting state data, 2 groups - follow up
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:22:32 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: MELODIC: automatic dimensionality estimation when identifying artifacts
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:41:57 -0400 |
39 lines |
MELODIC: automatic dimensionality estimation when identifying artifacts
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:29:51 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: MELODIC: PCA
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:39:46 -0500 |
35 lines |
MELODIC: PCA
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:28:20 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Missing contents of Data Folder
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:43:11 -0400 |
110 lines |
Re: Missing contents of Data Folder
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:36:15 +0200 |
87 lines |
Missing contents of Data Folder
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:05:40 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:26:19 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:49:02 +0100 |
194 lines |
Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:39:12 -0400 |
162 lines |
Re: Model-related vs unrelated activity
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:10:39 +0100 |
104 lines |
Model-related vs unrelated activity
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:38:24 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:36:18 -0400 |
285 lines |
Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:38:44 +0200 |
179 lines |
Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:54:41 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:55:18 +0200 |
248 lines |
Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 00:57:41 +0200 |
254 lines |
Re: More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:29:20 -0400 |
174 lines |
More elaborate contrasts in repeated measures ANOVA
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:39:58 +0200 |
120 lines |
Re: Multi-session linear trend
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:51:29 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: Multi-session linear trend
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:29:01 +0100 |
383 lines |
Re: Multi-session linear trend
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:25:47 +0200 |
300 lines |
Re: Multi-session linear trend
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:01:30 +0100 |
302 lines |
Re: Multi-session linear trend
|
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:13:25 +0200 |
219 lines |
Re: Multi-session linear trend
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:39:51 +0100 |
202 lines |
Multi-session linear trend
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:35:16 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:09:15 +0100 |
112 lines |
Multiple runs in one firstlevel feat
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:03:19 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: Multiple sessions in featquery
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:53:42 +0100 |
132 lines |
Multiple sessions in featquery
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:14:35 +0100 |
40 lines |
Neuro Bureau: Public release of preprocessed DTI data
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:56:10 -0400 |
109 lines |
Re: No component after group ICA
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:00:51 +0100 |
282 lines |
Re: No component after group ICA
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:37:48 -0500 |
204 lines |
Re: No component after group ICA
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:02:18 +0100 |
179 lines |
No component after group ICA
|
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:57:24 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:03:28 -0400 |
614 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:14:15 +0100 |
522 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:59:17 -0400 |
490 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:20:54 -0400 |
517 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:24:35 -0400 |
447 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:58:16 -0400 |
369 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:41:20 +0000 |
313 lines |
Re: oblique data registration
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:55:44 +0100 |
149 lines |
oblique data registration
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:57:34 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: padding and unpadding images with zeros
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:59:25 -0500 |
170 lines |
Re: Paired t-test with additional EV
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:02:14 -0500 |
95 lines |
Paired t-test with additional EV
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:37:25 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Paste bug for Glm_gui on Mac OSX
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:15:39 -0500 |
237 lines |
Paste bug for Glm_gui on Mac OSX
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 19:34:51 +0200 |
194 lines |
Patients' data and FA values in pons
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:39:53 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:47:25 +0200 |
165 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:05:44 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:20:45 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:17:01 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:43:51 +0200 |
309 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:35:10 +0200 |
332 lines |
Re: Philips DTI gradient table
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:35:27 +0100 |
147 lines |
Philips DTI gradient table
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:24:48 +0200 |
155 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:28:42 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:13:33 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:52:19 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:56:20 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:05:59 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:02:00 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:59:53 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:29:24 +0000 |
46 lines |
Philips Par/Rec Files and Gradient tables
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:18:56 +0100 |
27 lines |
Position available: Postdoc in the cognitive neuroscience of aging
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:13:16 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Possible SIENAX bug ?
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:31:32 +0100 |
566 lines |
Possible SIENAX bug ?
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:22:55 +0100 |
288 lines |
post-hoc t tests
|
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:01:18 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Prob Track across subjects
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:48:43 +0200 |
26 lines |
Prob Track across subjects
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:29 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: probabilistic ICA
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:53:16 -0400 |
29 lines |
probabilistic ICA
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:55:06 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Problem comparing binary tracts between groups using randomise (re-sent)
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 05:51:43 +0100 |
376 lines |
Problem comparing binary tracts between groups using randomise (re-sent)
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:07:04 -0400 |
360 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:41:56 -0400 |
232 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:55:34 +0100 |
209 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:04:25 -0400 |
189 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:59 -0400 |
160 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:22:20 +0100 |
123 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:41:41 -0400 |
105 lines |
Re: probtrackx command line help
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:29:08 +0100 |
80 lines |
probtrackx command line help
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:51:03 -0400 |
56 lines |
Projecting scalp positions/data onto the brain
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:01:08 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: question about contrasts and contrast masking
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:31:13 +0000 |
144 lines |
question about contrasts and contrast masking
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:19:52 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:20:32 -0400 |
256 lines |
Re: Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:30:11 +0000 |
259 lines |
Question about the TBSS regarding to the values extracted
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:09:52 -0400 |
188 lines |
Re: question on randomise and design.fts format
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:36:51 +0100 |
226 lines |
question on randomise and design.fts format
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:44:22 +0000 |
170 lines |
Re: Randomise Correlation Contrasts
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:56:02 -0500 |
155 lines |
Re: Randomise Correlation Contrasts
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:41:28 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: Randomise Correlation Contrasts
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:27:52 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: Randomise Question
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:26:51 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: Randomise Question
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:33:41 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: Randomise Question
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:24:42 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Randomise Question
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:25:03 +0100 |
201 lines |
Re: Randomise Question
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:17:02 -0400 |
147 lines |
Re: Randomise Question
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:46:12 +0100 |
100 lines |
Randomise Question
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:35:10 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: randomise takes forever
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:51:48 -0400 |
325 lines |
Re: randomise takes forever
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 17:45:13 +0100 |
327 lines |
randomise takes forever
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:24:44 -0400 |
257 lines |
Re: randomize permutation number
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:34:16 +0100 |
114 lines |
randomize permutation number
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:24:54 -0400 |
167 lines |
Re: randomsie error message
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:12:06 +0100 |
43 lines |
randomsie error message
|
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:23:20 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re : Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:49:19 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Re : [FSL] Having some problems with VBM tool
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:29:47 +0200 |
148 lines |
Re : [FSL] Having some problems with VBM tool
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:22:51 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re-run Feat after denoising?
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:04:50 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:11:58 +1100 |
801 lines |
Re: Repeated-measures, intercept necessary or not?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:19:08 +0100 |
148 lines |
Re: Repeated-measures, intercept necessary or not?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:48:29 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: res4D.nii.gz in higher-level FEAT analysis
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:09:54 +0100 |
144 lines |
res4D.nii.gz in higher-level FEAT analysis
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:42:23 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: resting state fMRI
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:15:42 -0400 |
34 lines |
resting state fMRI
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:52:11 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: resting state ICA maps atlas
|
Sat, 1 Oct 2011 12:06:05 +0200 |
172 lines |
Re: resting state multi-subject melodic
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:16:28 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: resting state multi-subject melodic
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:01:37 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: resting state multi-subject melodic
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:20:40 -0400 |
48 lines |
resting state multi-subject melodic
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:00:58 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Results tfce filled
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:43:53 +0800 |
95 lines |
Re: Results tfce filled
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:11:49 +0100 |
105 lines |
Results tfce filled
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:20:20 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: rmsdiff
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:38:40 -0700 |
165 lines |
Re: rmsdiff
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:19:10 +0100 |
72 lines |
rmsdiff
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:25:48 -0700 |
48 lines |
Running MD, AD and RD
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 03:50:48 +0100 |
20 lines |
seed-based correlation average maps
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:29:04 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: sienax issue
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:07:36 +0100 |
513 lines |
Re: sienax issue
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:47:09 -0700 |
167 lines |
Re: Slicer with 4D Images
|
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:11:22 +0100 |
103 lines |
Slicer with 4D Images
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:45:39 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Specifying number of IC components in Melodic
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:45:25 +0100 |
84 lines |
Specifying number of IC components in Melodic
|
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:10:56 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: strange results when using TBSS
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:35:48 +0100 |
202 lines |
strange results when using TBSS
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:45:36 +0800 |
137 lines |
Re: Structural Data for VBM
|
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:31:38 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: Structural Data for VBM
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:49:07 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: surface tracking
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:32:49 +0100 |
45 lines |
surface tracking
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:50:10 +1300 |
40 lines |
Re: SUSAN noise reduction
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:07:35 +0100 |
114 lines |
SUSAN noise reduction
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:23:18 -0400 |
49 lines |
SV: [FSL] Philips DTI gradient table
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:15:26 +0200 |
370 lines |
Re: switching to the older siena version 2.5 from the last version 2.6
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:57:03 +0100 |
52 lines |
switching to the older siena version 2.5 from the last version 2.6
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:40:53 +0100 |
29 lines |
t-test between 2 groups
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 02:39:00 +0100 |
26 lines |
T1 lesions
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:35:13 -0700 |
15 lines |
Re: tbss bvecs and bvals
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:43:44 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: tbss bvecs and bvals
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:27:41 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: tbss bvecs and bvals
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:20:35 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: tbss bvecs and bvals
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:00:09 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: tbss bvecs and bvals
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:02:30 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:51:01 +0100 |
673 lines |
Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:19:58 +0200 |
602 lines |
Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:34:51 +0100 |
562 lines |
Re: TBSS DEPROJECT ROI ATLAS
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:33:35 +0200 |
507 lines |
Re: TBSS Group Analysis: tbss_tstats1 or tbss_tstats2
|
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:27:48 +0000 |
188 lines |
TBSS Group Analysis: tbss_tstats1 or tbss_tstats2
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:40:47 +0000 |
125 lines |
Re: tbss output
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:59:08 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: tbss output
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:21:56 +0200 |
110 lines |
Re: tbss output
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:13:09 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: tbss output
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:53:18 +0800 |
180 lines |
Re: tbss output
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:31:35 +0200 |
64 lines |
Re: TBSS output
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:37:14 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: tbss output
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:45:28 +0000 |
49 lines |
tbss output
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:50:51 +0200 |
31 lines |
TBSS output
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:17:54 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: TBSS randomise F-test
|
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:03:48 +0200 |
78 lines |
Re: TBSS randomise F-test
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:52:06 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: TBSS randomise F-test
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:25:40 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: TBSS randomise F-test
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:39:52 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: TBSS randomise F-test
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:39:28 +0100 |
127 lines |
Re: TBSS randomise F-test
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:22:28 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:23:01 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:43:33 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:08:29 -0400 |
170 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:22:14 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:02:35 -0400 |
136 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:51:52 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:47:46 -0400 |
171 lines |
TBSS: sensitivity of analyses for age effect on FA
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:39:30 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg -S FAILED TO FIND
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:45:37 +0100 |
124 lines |
tbss_3_postreg -S FAILED TO FIND
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:58 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:59:21 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:08:00 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:43:40 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:42:24 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg -S running time?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:27:16 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: tbss_3_postreg memory erros and others
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:53:38 +0100 |
14 lines |
tbss_non_FA error - different FSL versions?
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:38:53 +0100 |
58 lines |
tbss_non_FA error - different FSL versions?
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:32:37 -0700 |
123 lines |
Re: tbss_skeleton: out of memory
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:57:40 +0100 |
227 lines |
Re: tbss_skeleton: out of memory
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:51:06 +0200 |
278 lines |
Re: tbss_skeleton: out of memory
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:47:11 +0000 |
173 lines |
tbss_skeleton: out of memory
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:33:16 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: Template from seed classifications
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 21:09:19 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Template from seed classifications
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:48:47 +0100 |
97 lines |
Re: Template from seed classifications
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:47:10 +0100 |
93 lines |
Template from seed classifications
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:20:05 +0200 |
20 lines |
Re: templates MD or FA
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:12:33 +0100 |
33 lines |
templates MD or FA
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:14:39 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: temporal derivatives?
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:18:52 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: temporal derivatives?
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:03:59 +0000 |
16 lines |
Re: temporal derivatives?
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:52:25 -0500 |
30 lines |
temporal derivatives?
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:36:50 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:08:32 -0400 |
104 lines |
Re: temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:30:43 +0200 |
33 lines |
temporal mode of ICs generated by TICA
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:15:33 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: The left/right flip image process
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:55:47 +0100 |
117 lines |
The left/right flip image process
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:14:46 +0800 |
55 lines |
Re: to get the Corresponding Cortical Area name of tracts?
|
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:29:32 +0800 |
203 lines |
Re: to get the Corresponding Cortical Area name of tracts?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:35:05 +0100 |
188 lines |
Too strong unwarping by FUGUE for the DTI image
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:54:18 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:03:37 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:45:34 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:36:12 +0200 |
89 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:27:32 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:57:00 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:17:22 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:08:58 +0200 |
65 lines |
Ubuntu 11.10 problem...
|
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:30:15 -0300 |
19 lines |
Re: Unthresholded effect size maps in FSL
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:38:39 +0100 |
131 lines |
Unthresholded effect size maps in FSL
|
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:15:57 +0000 |
137 lines |
Re: upsampling and downsampling images
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:48:15 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: upsampling and downsampling images
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:17:57 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: upsampling and downsampling images
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:48:05 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: upsampling and downsampling images
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:39:29 +0200 |
33 lines |
upsampling and downsampling images
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:27:46 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: Using 1st level FEAT residuals question
|
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:20:01 +0000 |
150 lines |
Re: Using 1st level FEAT residuals question
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:16:09 -0500 |
93 lines |
Using 1st level FEAT residuals question
|
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:40:32 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit
|
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:54:39 -0500 |
193 lines |
Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:00:49 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:44:38 -0400 |
117 lines |
Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit
|
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:38:15 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: Using b-matrix for dtifit
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:39:02 -0400 |
46 lines |
Using b-matrix for dtifit
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:23:32 +0000 |
17 lines |
Using FSL to obtain hemodynamic response for brain areas
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:19:13 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: using mask to skull strip?
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 07:29:02 -0700 |
187 lines |
Re: using mask to skull strip?
|
Sat, 1 Oct 2011 20:12:30 +0200 |
76 lines |
using mask to skull strip?
|
Sat, 1 Oct 2011 18:39:49 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor
|
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:36:41 -0400 |
622 lines |
Re: using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:04:33 +0100 |
118 lines |
using mean FA as a confound regressor in TBSS / setting up a paired-design with this confound regressor
|
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:15:26 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: VBM with more than one scanner
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:42:00 +0100 |
134 lines |
VBM with more than one scanner
|
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:49:02 +0000 |
48 lines |
VBMs
|
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:56:47 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Where to download cutoffcalc?
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:28:04 +0100 |
26 lines |
Where to download cutoffcalc?
|
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:45:24 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA?
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:06:36 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA?
|
Sun, 2 Oct 2011 09:53:02 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Where to preprocess resting state data for ICA? Fsl_glm error?
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:26:56 +0100 |
32 lines |
