|
|
Size
|
"Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Techniques for Macromolecules" Webinar
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:44:31 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: "Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Techniques for Macromolecules" Webinar
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:38:13 -0700 |
41 lines |
2nd P-CUBE User Meeting and Workshop on Advances in Protein Crystallization Zurich, 5-9 September 2011 - Registration now open
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:15:38 +0200 |
41370 lines |
3-year postdoc position at MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:31:24 +0100 |
157 lines |
96-well block storage
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:18:32 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: 96-well block storage
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:27:47 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: 96-well block storage
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:41:48 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: 96-well block storage
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:22:29 -0400 |
46 lines |
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:27:23 -0400 |
113 lines |
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:44:32 -0400 |
63 lines |
About heavy atom split
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:18:26 +0530 |
28248 lines |
Re: About heavy atom split
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:59:00 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: About heavy atom split
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:24:21 -0700 |
261 lines |
anomalous difference map?
|
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:50:37 -0700 |
50423 lines |
Re: anomalous difference map?
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:48:54 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: anomalous difference map?
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:28:32 -0700 |
89 lines |
Re: anomalous difference map?
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:16:23 +0200 |
222 lines |
AW: [ccp4bb] Calculating shape complementarity (sc) parameter using CCP4
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:01:57 +0200 |
906 lines |
AW: [ccp4bb] changing residue numbering in Coot
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:26 +0200 |
40 lines |
Beamtime @ SLS
|
Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:45:10 +0200 |
210 lines |
Calculating shape complementarity (sc) parameter using CCP4
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:18:22 -0400 |
2594 lines |
Call for paper "International Interdisciplinary Science Conference 2011"
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:11:31 +0100 |
85 lines |
CCP4 6.1.13
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:13:20 +0100 |
156 lines |
Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:14:03 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:10:38 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:37:29 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:38:21 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:59:11 -0700 |
16815 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:23:38 -0700 |
98 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:33:44 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:30:17 +0200 |
96 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:37:10 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Change cell parameter
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:53:32 -0400 |
61 lines |
changing residue numbering in Coot
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:13:56 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: changing residue numbering in Coot
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:48:05 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: changing residue numbering in Coot
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:46:24 +0200 |
57 lines |
cif-file with restraints for HC4
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:06:54 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: cif-file with restraints for HC4
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:40:34 +0200 |
66 lines |
citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:09:03 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:39:51 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:55:02 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:06:57 -0500 |
47 lines |
Convert .cif to mtz
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:26:20 +1200 |
19 lines |
Re: Convert .cif to mtz
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:02:53 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Convert .cif to mtz
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:54:09 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Convert .cif to mtz
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:00:31 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Convert .cif to mtz
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:08:38 +1200 |
16 lines |
Re: Convert .cif to mtz
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:31:34 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Convert .cif to mtz
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:04:37 -0700 |
35 lines |
convert .osc file to .img
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:48:04 +1200 |
17 lines |
Re: convert .osc file to .img
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:21:34 +0100 |
37 lines |
Criteria For Solvent Components
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:34:35 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Criteria For Solvent Components
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:10:32 +0200 |
60 lines |
cryosleeves with ID 22 mm
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:20:56 -0400 |
94 lines |
Cryotools
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:22:05 -0400 |
26 lines |
CSHL X-ray Methods in Structural Biology Course late Oct 2011: Application deadline June 15th
|
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:47:31 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: CSHL X-ray Methods in Structural Biology Course late Oct 2011: Application deadline June 15th
|
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:01:23 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: CSHL X-ray Methods in Structural Biology Course late Oct 2011: Application deadline June 15th
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:31:40 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Defining an ellipse around a protein structure
|
Tue, 31 May 2011 17:10:35 -0700 |
63 lines |
Diamond phase III proposal. Call for Expressions of Interest. Deadline looming!
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:53:19 +0100 |
60 lines |
EM map sigma level.
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:24:54 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: EM map sigma level.
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:41:02 -0700 |
101 lines |
Re: EM map sigma level.
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:43:04 -0400 |
123 lines |
Re: EM map sigma level.
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:11:12 -0400 |
72 lines |
EMBO/EMBL Symposium: Structure and Dynamics of Protein Networks, 13 - 16 October 2011
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:49:39 +0200 |
290 lines |
Energy minimization with restrain
|
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:48:18 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Energy minimization with restrain
|
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:09:07 +0000 |
1157 lines |
Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:01:31 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:49:02 +0200 |
70 lines |
Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:19:26 -0700 |
529 lines |
Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:22:50 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:43:20 +0200 |
100 lines |
Fortran runtime error, Refmac
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:38:14 +0200 |
49 lines |
FreeR_flag
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:44:52 +1200 |
19 lines |
Re: FreeR_flag
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:58:31 -0700 |
66 lines |
generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:52:17 +0100 |
289 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:08:44 +0200 |
120 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:23:06 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:07:55 +0000 |
270 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:36:31 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:43:33 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:46:16 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: generate large symmetry model
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:59:42 +0200 |
35 lines |
Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:53:42 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:28:57 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:50:00 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:30:54 -0400 |
479 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:39:57 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:44:17 -0400 |
166 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:25:09 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:26:21 +0100 |
84 lines |
GTP Agarose Resin
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:21:02 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: GTP Agarose Resin
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:19:03 -0700 |
123 lines |
Hampton's adjustable cryoloop
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:30:16 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: Hampton's adjustable cryoloop
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:33:23 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Hampton's adjustable cryoloop
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:41 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: Hampton's adjustable cryoloop
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:36:59 -0500 |
89 lines |
hello
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:08:49 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: hello
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:59:26 +0200 |
72 lines |
Re: hello
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:21:33 -0400 |
109 lines |
Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:11:28 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:25:05 -0700 |
118 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:42:00 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:42:47 -0700 |
203 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:54:29 -0400 |
102 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:57:31 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:30:55 +0200 |
163 lines |
Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:45:46 -0400 |
105 lines |
Heme binding protein
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:49:24 +0100 |
26 lines |
Homology modelling
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:42:29 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Homology modelling
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:44:17 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Homology modelling
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:57:07 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Homology modelling
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:10:00 +1000 |
42 lines |
Re: Homology modelling
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:29:27 -0400 |
41 lines |
How can I calculate the numbers of molecules in the AU?
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:50:32 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: How can I calculate the numbers of molecules in the AU?
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:05:46 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: How can I calculate the numbers of molecules in the AU?
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:07:04 +0100 |
51 lines |
How to create a link-record
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:04:31 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: How to create a link-record
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:27:40 +0200 |
40 lines |
how to estimate bond length error from crystal structure
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:57:45 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: how to estimate bond length error from crystal structure
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:24:35 -0700 |
36 lines |
How to feed local structures to BALBES?
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:26:26 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: How to feed local structures to BALBES?
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:47:53 +0100 |
76 lines |
How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:05:27 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:22:14 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:32:48 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:00:22 -0500 |
119 lines |
Incubators
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:58:24 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:09:24 +0200 |
30 lines |
International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:37:57 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:07:28 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:24:14 +0100 |
78 lines |
IUCr satellitte
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:15:39 -0500 |
8926 lines |
Kd's in Crystals
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:58:10 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:04:40 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:00:31 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:19:34 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:09:03 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:52:24 -0700 |
112 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:04:35 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:20:42 -0600 |
65 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:32:02 -0700 |
147 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:44:50 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:33:27 -0600 |
1936 lines |
Re: Kd's in Crystals
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:35:42 +0300 |
93 lines |
Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:37:57 -0700 |
182 lines |
Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:35:32 -0700 |
666 lines |
Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:38:33 -0400 |
603 lines |
Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:54:06 -0500 |
217 lines |
Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation
|
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:28:28 +0100 |
38 lines |
late announcement: XDS maintenance release
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:51:57 +0200 |
169 lines |
Library description for Pentacoordinated phosphate.
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:03:43 +0530 |
62 lines |
Re: Library description for Pentacoordinated phosphate.
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:16:39 -0400 |
101 lines |
low res. SAD phasing
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:36:59 +0300 |
27 lines |
Re: low res. SAD phasing
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:16:50 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: low res. SAD phasing
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:51:06 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: low res. SAD phasing
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:42 +0300 |
99 lines |
Re: low res. SAD phasing
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:19:32 +0200 |
135 lines |
Re: low res. SAD phasing
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:02:40 +0800 |
332 lines |
map format conversion
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:57:52 +0900 |
248 lines |
March 15, 2010 deadline- User proposal submission for Collaborative Crystallography at BCSB
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:02:24 -0700 |
35 lines |
Milestones in Crystallography
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:43:43 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: Milestones in Crystallography
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:02:32 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Milestones in Crystallography
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:16:29 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: Milestones in Crystallography
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:07:32 -0400 |
75 lines |
MR question
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:25:09 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: MR question
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:01:40 +0200 |
60 lines |
Re: MR question
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:41:25 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: MR question
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:49:06 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: MR question
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:53:28 +0100 |
50 lines |
Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:15:51 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:33:47 -0700 |
176 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:43:20 -0400 |
350 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:52:04 -0700 |
353 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:54:08 -0600 |
66 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:55:18 -0400 |
392 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:06:25 -0700 |
418 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:15:11 -0400 |
231 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:19:01 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:20:02 -0700 |
474 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:24:14 +0100 |
147 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:25:31 +0300 |
500 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:01:14 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:06:51 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:08:15 -0700 |
223 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:31:51 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:33:13 -0700 |
583 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:53:56 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:38 -0500 |
334 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:22:34 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:22:40 +0000 |
350 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:34:44 -0400 |
574 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:29 -0700 |
284 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:51:57 -0700 |
289 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:09 -0700 |
412 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:57:42 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:05:11 -0600 |
455 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:06:53 +0000 |
521 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:17:32 -0700 |
154 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:21:28 +0000 |
646 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:21:35 -0700 |
411 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:30:04 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:01:11 +0000 |
113 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:03:42 -0400 |
320 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:36:47 -0400 |
167 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:28:08 +0200 |
92 lines |
Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:04:06 -0500 |
58 lines |
Neutrons in Biology 2011 - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:16:13 +0200 |
454 lines |
New episode of Quips - Quite Interesting PDB Structures
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:34:29 +0200 |
33 lines |
nmr question
|
Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:20:23 +0200 |
27 lines |
No Observed SO4 in AmSO4 Crystallizations
|
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:26 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: No Observed SO4 in AmSO4 Crystallizations
|
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:43:41 -0500 |
96 lines |
No problems with BUSTER
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:32:21 +0200 |
1718 lines |
non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:51:21 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:19 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:26:55 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:02:21 -0700 |
80 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:09:42 +0200 |
86 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:35:36 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:16:51 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:22:39 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:38:41 -0500 |
127 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:00:59 +0200 |
159 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:10:19 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:27:52 -0400 |
29 lines |
nVidia Quadro 4000 and the stereo bracket
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:44:29 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: nVidia Quadro 4000 and the stereo bracket
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:53:36 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: nVidia Quadro 4000 and the stereo bracket
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:29:48 -0400 |
51 lines |
Off topic question. NACCESS
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:25:56 +0200 |
14 lines |
Re: Off topic question. NACCESS
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:35:04 +0900 |
23 lines |
Re: Off topic question. NACCESS
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:09:50 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: Off topic question. NACCESS
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:44:32 -0700 |
161 lines |
Re: Off topic question. NACCESS
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:41:08 -0400 |
98 lines |
off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:49:54 +0200 |
7118 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:09:25 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:10:14 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:24:42 -0700 |
1873 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:43:07 -0400 |
13 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:59:19 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:52:58 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:09:33 +0300 |
42 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:55:42 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:17:30 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike
|
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:43:49 +0000 |
77 lines |
P-CUBE workshop on Workshop on Advances in Protein Crystallization and 2nd P-CUBE User Meeting, 5 - 9 September 2011, Zurich, Switzerland
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:46:23 +0200 |
225 lines |
Phase III beamline at Diamond Light Source. Call for support.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:10:00 +0100 |
41 lines |
PhD candidate
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:57:07 +0000 |
3109 lines |
PhD position
|
Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:40:41 +0100 |
179 lines |
PhD student position
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:59:39 +0200 |
182 lines |
PhD studentships for October 2011, University of Essex
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:08:08 +0000 |
59 lines |
PhD-studentship for Structure Mining at EMBL Hamburg
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:55:52 +0200 |
43 lines |
Position available with Rigaku - Application Scientist in Life Sciences Division - The Woodlands, TX
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:27:50 -0500 |
174 lines |
Post-doc position in cryo-EM at Oxford
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:35:13 +0100 |
33 lines |
Post-doctoral position available
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:37:13 +0200 |
205 lines |
Postdoc position at the MRC-NIMR, London, UK
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:59:14 +0100 |
48 lines |
postdoctoral opportunity in Dallas, TX
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:22:29 -0700 |
388 lines |
postdoctoral position
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:45:04 -0500 |
1446 lines |
Postdoctoral Position - Washington University in St. Louis
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:01:51 -0500 |
26 lines |
Postdoctoral position available
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:22:00 -0500 |
257 lines |
Postdoctoral Positions - Structural Characterization of Intermediate Filaments
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:02:42 -0400 |
199 lines |
Postdoctoral Research Fellow - Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex - Ref 292
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:51:20 +0000 |
63 lines |
postgraduate studentship available
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:19:45 +0100 |
70 lines |
Practical course in MEMBRANE PROTEINS - Registration OPEN
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:37:33 +0000 |
6999 lines |
Problem running shelxC/D/E
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:35:59 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:41:34 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:49:45 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:05:57 +0200 |
75 lines |
Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:35:12 -0700 |
67 lines |
Program to analyze water mediated interactions?
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:16:13 -0400 |
153 lines |
Re: Program to analyze water mediated interactions?
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:37:13 +0100 |
47 lines |
proteases for limited proteolysis, catalog numbers
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:26:35 -0400 |
35 lines |
Protein scientist position at Syngenta
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:19:19 +0100 |
44 lines |
PUI session at 2012 ACA meeting
|
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:45:29 -0400 |
66 lines |
PyMol APBS Tools ERRORS
|
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:16:20 +0800 |
55 lines |
Re: PyMol APBS Tools ERRORS
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:40:30 +0530 |
145 lines |
Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:44:55 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:14:22 -0700 |
122 lines |
Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:56:30 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:16:01 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:59:07 +0200 |
183 lines |
Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:28:50 +0100 |
160 lines |
Fwd: Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:59:07 +0200 |
341 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:14:23 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:59:32 +0800 |
121 lines |
Refmac for windows
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:58:10 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Refmac for windows
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:08:55 +0200 |
64 lines |
Re: Refmac for windows
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:47:48 +0100 |
91 lines |
refmac problem with anisotropic Us
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:33:10 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:48:03 -0700 |
133 lines |
Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:58:34 -0700 |
64 lines |
Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:10:05 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us
|
Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:35:26 +0200 |
219 lines |
Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:50:30 -0400 |
81 lines |
Refmac5: put restraint on only peptide bonds
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:49:18 +0900 |
164 lines |
Re: Refmac5: put restraint on only peptide bonds
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:21:52 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Refmac5: put restraint on only peptide bonds
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:21:42 +0100 |
60 lines |
regarding refinement and structure determination by MR
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:46:00 +0800 |
20566 lines |
Re: regarding refinement and structure determination by MR
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:58:55 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: regarding refinement and structure determination by MR
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:38:39 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: regarding refinement and structure determination by MR
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:40:00 +0200 |
247 lines |
Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:23:12 +0530 |
94 lines |
Re: Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:37:10 +0200 |
89 lines |
Re: Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:06:35 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:04:56 +1000 |
141 lines |
Research Fellow Position
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:45:19 +0200 |
5580 lines |
Research Fellow Position
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:45:17 +0200 |
3173 lines |
Sc calculation
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:22:27 +0200 |
2686 lines |
Re: Sc calculation
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:47 +1000 |
51 lines |
SC example
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:44:28 +0900 |
109 lines |
Re: SC example
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:26:38 +0200 |
105 lines |
Re: SC example
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:35:19 +0900 |
69 lines |
Re: SC example
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:37 +0900 |
80 lines |
selenomethionine contact
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:25:43 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: selenomethionine contact
|
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:55:31 -0500 |
53 lines |
self rotation function
|
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:01:06 -0700 |
616 lines |
Re: self rotation function
|
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:03:42 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: self rotation function
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:44:01 +0100 |
40 lines |
self rotation function
|
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:04:28 +0100 |
179 lines |
Solvent channel volume measurement
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:40:47 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: Solvent channel volume measurement
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:37:42 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: Solvent channel volume measurement
|
Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:24:01 -0600 |
42 lines |
Re: Solvent channel volume measurement [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:55:06 +1000 |
117 lines |
Re: Solvent channel volume measurement [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:58:03 +0900 |
54 lines |
Solving the structure
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:50:52 +0200 |
59 lines |
Re: Solving the structure
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:19:49 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Solving the structure
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:25:25 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Solving the structure
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:53:41 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: Solving the structure
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:17:24 +0100 |
31 lines |
sortwater in ccp4
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:00:04 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: sortwater in ccp4
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:18:35 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: statistics of A/B
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 05:45:53 -0700 |
91 lines |
Re: statistics of A/B
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:50:07 -0400 |
183 lines |
Summer X-rays at the NSLS
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:54:35 -0400 |
47 lines |
Surface complementary output
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:28:26 +0900 |
137 lines |
Re: Surface complementary output
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:03:46 +1000 |
238 lines |
The Good and the Bad crystal contact?
|
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:22:26 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?
|
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:42:57 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?
|
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:36:54 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:09:00 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?
|
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:19:56 +0100 |
32 lines |
Two different asymmetric units from two different crystallization conditions
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:19:31 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: Two different asymmetric units from two different crystallization conditions
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:33:11 +0900 |
222 lines |
Re: Two different asymmetric units from two different crystallization conditions
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:22:42 +0100 |
41 lines |
Unit cell change - was Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:40 -0400 |
133 lines |
Re: Unit cell change - was Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:35:08 +0200 |
151 lines |
Re: Unit cell change - was Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:50:27 +0100 |
154 lines |
unsubscription request
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:41:03 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: unsubscription request
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:54:30 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: unsubscription request
|
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:48:55 +0200 |
31 lines |
vacancy for a research scientist at the ILL
|
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:17:24 +0200 |
718 lines |
Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:35:21 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:45:36 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:55:00 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:52:14 -0700 |
67 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:01:56 -0700 |
114 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:02:57 -0700 |
163 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:14:31 -0700 |
138 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:22:15 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:21:30 -0400 |
93 lines |
Re: Very low resolution map.
|
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:35:36 -0500 |
582 lines |
Waters in ADIT
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:22 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: Waters in ADIT
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:10:09 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: Waters in ADIT
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:19:39 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Waters in ADIT
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:49:43 -0400 |
85 lines |
Re: Waters in ADIT
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:01:45 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Waters in ADIT
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:47:55 +0200 |
123 lines |
Way off topic.. less than 96 well culture plates in black?
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:17:35 -0600 |
32 lines |
Workshop on Low to Moderate Resolution Structure Determination
|
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:44:41 -0500 |
28 lines |
XDS question
|
Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:24:00 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:50:44 +0200 |
78 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:59:01 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:29:19 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:16:27 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:43:50 +0200 |
80 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:47:19 +0200 |
238 lines |
Re: XDS question
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:12:58 +0200 |
104 lines |
Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:22:43 -0400 |
332 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:20:39 +0300 |
46 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:32:44 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:34:21 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:00:24 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:59:52 -0400 |
120 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:42:28 -0700 |
160 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:39:38 -0500 |
258 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:59:40 -0400 |
249 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:12:28 -0400 |
268 lines |
Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart
|
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:54:50 -0700 |
240 lines |
Re: [CONCEAL]
|
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:34:24 -0700 |
126 lines |
Re: [phenixbb] [Fwd: Re: elbow.join_cif_files error]
|
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:25:51 -0600 |
20 lines |